Bundy Ranch standoff pictures the mainstream media doesn’t ever want you to see

newsNatural News – by Mike Adams

he Bundy Ranch standoff is the true story of American history that the mainstream media doesn’t want you to see. If such an event had happened in Ukraine, or Russia, or China, it would have received front-page coverage across the entire U.S. press. But because it took place within U.S. borders, there was a nationwide media blackout on the story, complete with orders that news outlets broadcast no pictures, no videos and no live reports from the scene.

Ever wonder what’s so important about Bundy Ranch that the institutions of media and government have gone to extraordinary lengths to censor, including declaring a “no fly zone” over the airspace?  

The answer to that question is found in the photos below, republished with permission from Guerilla Media Network whose founder, Pete Santilli, was one of the key persons on the ground urging peace and non-violence as evidenced in this secret recording released by Natural News.

The federal government, on the other hand, brought hundreds of armed men, snipers, helicopters and even what the mainstream media would characterize as “assault rifles” to the scene — all for what BLM claims was an effort to “save the desert tortoise!”

Permission was granted to Natural News to publish these photos, but I was instructed to relay the message that if any mainstream media sources which to use these photos, they must first contact GMN (press@gmn.is) for permissions and usage rights.

Now, behold the chapter of American history you were never supposed to know took place:

Learn more about alternative media and the “new rules of engagement” in this video interview:

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/044729_Bundy_ranch_photos_news_blackout.html#ixzz2z1O3j7f8

http://www.naturalnews.com/044729_Bundy_ranch_photos_news_blackout.html

16 thoughts on “Bundy Ranch standoff pictures the mainstream media doesn’t ever want you to see

    1. I don’t even think they will stop a .30-06……I don’t think anyone should own less than a .308/7.62×51

  1. Ya all know what really bothers me is would there be a turnout like they had for Bundy if it was for a small private home owner or a small littlle honest farmer ??
    when you are that big – remember – you are not honest for the most part!!
    Yea, I knew some people that lost their house and property because the govt.wantd to F wth them. Yea Just like me screw the govt. F` them but would the militia be there for the little guy???, I doubt it
    🙁 🙁

    1. We won’t be able to save everyone, diggerdan. The important thing is that the people finally stood firm against tyranny, just like the gun owners in Connecticut and New York. I can now better understand why the MSM and Obama have been inexplicably silent in this matter.

      Since Mike Adams got involved, I am more reluctant to call the Bundy Ranch standoff a rehearsed or staged event. Perhaps now, the people whom have been waiting for a queue for when to begin the Revolution, will be more willing to take action when the Feds (BLM) attempt to seize land, or the bootjacks (ATF) attempt to seize guns. The difference between we the people and the US Government is that they (FED/BLM) know they are in the wrong, and their agents in the field do not want to die defending their position; we the people would rather die defending our property, then to have our families live as helpless slaves under tyranny.

      This entire matter stems from the fact that our Government has always needed Public Land to use as collateral for their massive debt and perpetual borrowing.

      The BLM has indeed miscalculated the peoples response to their unconstitutional acts; now we just wait to see how they will respond to the peoples’ resistance — or leaving us with the Law of Physics to resolve the question: What will happen when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object?

    2. I hope that WHEN the BLM and the FEDS attack we will attack across the entire country. Maybe then we will free AmeriKa from communism both……both Democrat AND Republican communism. Regardless of who wins at the ranch they damn sure can’t win across the whole country.

      1. Which again explains why the MSM and Obama have been silent… they do not want this Bundy Ranch standoff to be seen or, serve as an example of presidence over the USA’s domestic control.

        You are correct, Mr. Fantastic; the Feds cannot win over the entire country. This is why they strategically take small bites — this time, however, they tried to bite-off more than they could chew.

    3. In answer to your question, Dan, yes they absolutely would. Problem is it is hard for the little guy to let people know what is going on in time to be saved. Randy Weaver and his family were little guys and poor, and the militia did come and they did save lives, as every one of the Weavers would have been killed had the militia not been there.

    1. Nobody said the photos are top secret. It is just that the mainstream is not going to show these HEAVILY ARMED aggressors, but rather they try to portray the BLM as just a group of police officers wearing normal uniforms, instead of kevlar helmets and bullet proof vests.
      Which leads me to ask, what is the intent of your comment? To belittle what happened there?

  2. I have some questions regarding the 12 pics after the article, if anyone would be so kind to answer:

    1st pic: The mercenary, who attempted to talk the ranchers out of retrieving the cattle, is dressed differently (backwards brown khaki baseball cap, black T-shirt, greenish khaki flak vest, taupe khaki pants) than everyone else on the mercenary side, except perhaps the man in the 10th pic. Is this a tactic used to infiltrate militia? Is this a let-down-your-guard technique? Does the dress signify his role on the team?

    2nd pic: Are those Vegas police in the long-sleeved khaki tan uniform with the black stripe down the pants, or state troopers?

    7th pic: Another mercenary dressed differently than all the others with backwards baseball cap, black flak vest, bright green/almost aqua T-shirt, and blue jeans. Who does this hired gun work for? Is that swat in military green battledress?

    8th pic: What kind of gun is the battle-dressed mercenary 2nd from left holding, with the wood-colored butt and wide barrel?

    10th pic: The older-looking (just my impression) man on the right of the group, wearing a black T-shirt and brown khaki baseball cap, any idea on his agency and his function there? It looks like he’s wearing the same type of cap as the BLM (upside down triangle decal on sleeve) mercenary in the 11th pic, 2nd from left in light tan khaki, ocher khaki flak vest.

    11th pic: The green battle-dressed mercenary on the right, what kind of gun is the thick-barreled piece? Any idea what the insignia or decal on the front of his helmet denotes? The mercenary 3rd from the right, what does his black helmet signify as opposed to the others’ green-khaki helmets?

    All in all, very interesting. Thanks for the post, Paul.

    1. the second operative behind the guy holding the shield looks to be issued a paint ball gun
      look at the bean shaped ball magazine on top of his rifle.
      the other rifle man looks to be holding a launching gun for bean bags or gas/flash bang delivery rifle
      the operative with what looks to be an M4 looks like it has a plugged barrel
      Im beginning to think some of these shots are staged, or was this whole thing staged or is the deal with the bundys for real and this was a government scare tactic

  3. the large bore weapons are 38/40mm grenade launchers.

    you can fire anything from smoke/gas to beanbags or high-explosives.
    they split open like a shotgun and you slide the cartridge into the rear of the barrel & snap it closed.

  4. HA! In the 8th and 9th pics, all I see are cowards hiding behind a shield and holding each other by the hand. What a bunch of sissies.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*