listen here

Patriot Broadcast From the Trenches Schedule 

Chaffetz: State Department Hiding Benghazi Survivors

Breitbart – by Kerry Picket

Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R- UT) told Breitbart News on Wednesday that he has been “thwarted” by the State Department from seeing any Americans who survived the deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in  Benghazi. Many people forget that there were Americans who survived the Benghazi attack, some of whom were badly injured and are still recovering.

“My understanding is that we still have some people in the hospital. I’d like to visit with them and wish them nothing but the best but the State Department has seen it unfit for me to know who those people are—or even how many there are,” Rep. Chaffetz said. “I don’t know who they are. I don’t know where they live. I don’t know what state they’re from. I don’t even know how many there are. It doesn’t seem right to me.”

“This is so patently different than any other experience I’ve had. Unfortunately, people have been killed and maimed and in harm’s way in Afghanistan and Iraq and in points beyond. It’s typically been the case that they would release those names but in this case, they won’t. My challenge is to the media. You try and figure it out. They won’t let Congress know. They won’t seem to let the media know either.”

Breitbart News sent an inquiry to the State Department regarding those who survived the attack in Benghazi and is awaiting a response.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/12/12/Chaffetz-Benghazi-State-Dept

This entry was posted in News, Videos. Bookmark the permalink.
2111
Don't forget to answer the Security Question before you post comment.

4 Responses to Chaffetz: State Department Hiding Benghazi Survivors

  1. robertsgt40 says:

    I suggest a rash of heart attacks and suicides are in the making.

  2. Walter says:

    This story has potentially big implications. There is abundant evidence of continuing problems with the official version of events. When the truth is your enemy you have problems.

  3. Ricochet says:

    The whole operation does not add up so they are trying hard to bury it. Watergate was too hard to bury so I am hoping this one is too. And just for the record Watergate is not over. The JFK hit is behind the break in. Back to Libiya. How did cia agent Stevens get to a hospital then die? Who took him there? Not the cia or local unarmed guards. With al ansar shuria fanatics raising hell with rpg’s and AK 47′s and torching the place would a local good samaratin go into a burning embassy (cia base) and rescue the poor (cia) ambassador? There were armed crowds that the escape vehicle had to evade. So who took Stevens to the hospital? Watch the video and you will see that Stevens wasn’t dragged out by the ankle (s) like they did to the mercenaries in Fullujah and strung up. He was carried out under the armpits to do as little harm as possible. Then he was carried fireman rescue style over the shoulder, again a life saving technique, short answer I believ was the invaders. Do no harm. Save the target at all costs. The only others killed were Sean Smith at the initial fire in the “consolute” by smoke inhalation and (think very carefully here) Woods and Doherty the cia agents that broke away from the stand down order to not assist. Is it not strange how it was only those 2? The wounded were collateral damage, probably from the “un”armed drones. The official story is that they were painting targets with laser for help that never came. Problem there is active laser targeting systems require both laser AND weapons platform to work. If the drones were unarmed then where is the active feed for the targeting system to interact with? Just because a laser is marking a target the operator can re-direct co-ordinates. Bottom line in the parlance of the mafia. Those guys was whacked.

  4. G Street says:

    Let’s see, Rice withdrew her name from consideration because she’s a nice person and didn’t want to make a fuss. OTH, the Repos are equally nice folks who would never practice extra-judicial covert warfare and/or profiteering and treason…. hmmm. Who and what to believe?

    And Chuck Hagel? Is this intra-family warfare? A break with Israel? A consolidation of power? Bueller? Anyone?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What is 2 + 13 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)