It’s not just paranoid people who should be freaked out about having unmanned spy drones hovering over their neighborhoods at all times, as a new report from the Congressional Research Service says that drones could effectively end privacy in the United States. Andrew Counts of DigitalTrends does an excellent job of going through the CRS report and finds a number of details that should unnerve anyone who cares one bit about their right to privacy.
In no particular order, here are the scariest aspects of the report:
- The Federal Aviation Administration estimates that there will be 30,000 drones flying around by 2032 that will be “operated by police, military, public health and safety agencies, corporations, and the public in general.”
- Some of these drones will inevitably be equipped with electromagnetic radars that use thermal imaging techniques to see through walls
- Some of these drones could easily be equipped with cameras that have facial recognition technology that can also “recognize and track individuals based on attributes such as height, age, gender, and skin color.”
The report concludes that in order to avoid losing our privacy completely, lawmakers will need to step up to the plate and define exactly what constitutes acceptable use of drones by both public officials and private individuals.
Happily, there have been two pieces of drone regulation brought before Congress in recent months: one bill, introduced by Rep Austin Scott (R-GA) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) ”would require the federal government to gain a warrant based on probable cause before drones could be used for surveillance purposes.” Another, introduced by Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX) “would also require law enforcement to obtain a warrant for drone surveillance, among other restrictions.”
While there’s no way of knowing whether these bills will pass anytime soon, it is at least nice to see this issue is on lawmakers’ radar.
That bill introduced by Rep. Austin Scott and Sen. Rand Paul is just more hot air because probable cause could mean anything. Having long hair and being skinny could be interpreted as being on drugs, going through a divorce and your wife turns up dead could mean that it is probable cause ya murdered your wife. These drones are just another way for the govt. snoops to spy on us all when they should be spying on themselves
With FISA extended, warrantless surveillance by any means will be the norm. Screws to be tightened accordingly
“■The Federal Aviation Administration estimates that there will be 30,000 drones flying around by 2032 that will be “operated by police, military, public health and safety agencies, corporations, and the public in general.”
Damned optimistic of them, thinking there’ll be anything left by then.
“Happily, there have been two pieces of drone regulation brought before Congress in recent months: one bill, introduced by Rep Austin Scott (R-GA) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) ”would require the federal government to gain a warrant based on probable cause before drones could be used for surveillance purposes”
Unhappily, even if they do pass, the so-called ‘government’ will simply ignore them, just like they ignore the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Exactly!