listen here

Patriot Broadcast From the Trenches Schedule 

Gulf Of Mexico 52x More Toxic From Corexit Clean Up Than The Original Oil Spill Itself

Before It’s News – by Barracuda

Study shows mixing oil with dispersant increased toxicity to Gulf’s ecosystems.

If the 4.9 million barrels of oil that spilled into the Gulf of Mexico during the 2010 Deep Water Horizon spill was a ecological disaster, the two million gallons of dispersant used to clean it up apparently made it even worse – 52-times more toxic. That’s according to new research from the Georgia Institute of Technology and Universidad Autonoma de Aguascalientes (UAA), Mexico.

The study found that mixing the dispersant with oil increased toxicity of the mixture up to 52-fold over the oil alone. In toxicity tests in the lab, the mixture’s effects increased mortality of rotifers, a microscopic grazing animal at the base of the Gulf’s food web. The findings are published online by the journal Environmental Pollution and will appear in the February 2013 print edition.

Using oil from the Deep Water Horizon spill and Corexit, the dispersant required by the Environmental Protection Agency for clean up, the researchers tested toxicity of oil, dispersant and mixtures on five strains of rotifers. Rotifers have long been used by ecotoxicologists to assess toxicity in marine waters because of their fast response time, ease of use in tests and sensitivity to toxicants. In addition to causing mortality in adult rotifers, as little as 2.6 percent of the oil-dispersant mixture inhibited rotifer egg hatching by 50 percent. Inhibition of rotifer egg hatching from the sediments is important because these eggs hatch into rotifers each spring, reproduce in the water column, and provide food for baby fish, shrimp and crabs in estuaries.

“Dispersants are preapproved to help clean up oil spills and are widely used during disasters,” said UAA’s Roberto-Rico Martinez, who led the study. “But we have a poor understanding of their toxicity. Our study indicates the increase in toxicity may have been greatly underestimated following the Macondo well explosion.”

Martinez performed the research while he was a Fulbright Fellow at Georgia Tech in the lab of School of Biology Professor Terry Snell. They hope that the study will encourage more scientists to investigate how oil and dispersants impact marine food webs and lead to improved management of future oil spills.

“What remains to be determined is whether the benefits of dispersing the oil by using Corexit are outweighed by the substantial increase in toxicity of the mixture,” said Snell, chair of the School of Biology. “Perhaps we should allow the oil to naturally disperse. It might take longer, but it would have less toxic impact on marine ecosystems.”

http://beforeitsnews.com/environment/2012/11/gulf-of-mexico-52x-more-toxic-from-the-corexit-clean-up-than-the-original-oil-spill-itself-2455448.html

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.
25236
Don't forget to answer the Security Question before you post comment.

3 Responses to Gulf Of Mexico 52x More Toxic From Corexit Clean Up Than The Original Oil Spill Itself

  1. robertsgt40 says:

    I’m guessing the europeans had good reason to ban Corexit in Europe. Now we know why

    • # 1 NWO Hatr says:

      Just an ‘honest’ mistake, most likely.

      I’m sure they wouldn’t INTENTIONALLY put anything they knew to be toxic into the environment.

  2. ehswan says:

    The use of corexit is banned in Britain and was NOT recommended in the Gulf spill. All that it accomplished besides further poisoning the Gulf was to make clean up impossible. The reason that it was used was to prevent an accurate count of the number of barrels spilled.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What is 11 + 4 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)