listen here

Patriot Broadcast From the Trenches Schedule 

Here Is A Summary Of Feinstein’s New Assault Weapons Ban Bill

The Real Revo

It’s a two page summary – here. Quoting the summary:

Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:

 120 specifically-named firearms
 Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic
 Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept
more than 10 rounds


Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
 Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test
 Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from
the characteristics test
 Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address
attempts to “work around” prior bans

Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds.

Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:
 Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment
 Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or
sporting purposes and
 Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms
Act, to include:

o Background check of owner and any transferee;
o Type and serial number of the firearm;
o Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
o Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that
possession would not violate State or local law; and
o Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration

http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=90764

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.
2737
Don't forget to answer the Security Question before you post comment.

11 Responses to Here Is A Summary Of Feinstein’s New Assault Weapons Ban Bill

  1. REDHORSE says:

    that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms.So then we all know what comes next, step two of the plan, confiscation.

  2. TranceAm says:

    4 words : “Shall not be Infringed”

    http://www.naturalnews.com/038471_Bill_of_Rights_declaration_America.html

    Why the Bill of Rights extends through all time and innovation
    Importantly, the rights described in the Bill of Rights extend through all time and cover all innovations and technological advances. It was not written to cover only those things that existed in 1791, but rather to serve as a template of liberty encompassing innovation, advancement and all future expressions of those rights, regardless of what devices or technologies may come into existence.

    The Right to Free Speech, for example, does not merely protect speech written on scrolls or rolled out of a Gutenberg press. It covers all expressions of free speech, including speech expressed through devices that did not exist in the late 1700′s: e-books, websites, blogs, television programs, bumper stickers and more. This very website, Natural News is a pure expression of the First Amendment. It would seem foolish and wrongheaded to argue that the First Amendment only applied to the printing press of the day and not to modern-day websites or e-books, yet that is exactly what many misguided people argue today when they say the Second Amendment only applies to “Muskets and bayonets.”

    The Second Amendment guarantees your right to keep and bear the firearms of your time. What are the firearms of our time? AR-15 rifles. 308 sniper rifles. 50 caliber Barretts. 12-gauge shotguns. Handguns with night sights and high-capacity magazines. Your right to own, carry, buy, sell and transfer these items is as solidly safeguarded as your right to free speech. The Bill of Rights is not negotiable.

    Those who oppose the Bill of Rights are enemies of America
    Some misguided, if not treasonous, U.S. Senators, lawmakers and public servants in the executive branch of government currently suffer under the dangerous misconception that the Bill of Rights only exists because they allow it to. They foolishly believe that they can selectively pick and choose which rights to nullify via new legislation or by the stroke of an executive pen. This delusion is not merely wrong-headed and arrogant, it poses a grave threat to the Republic and all its future generations.

    Enemies of the Bill of Rights are enemies of America. Whether those enemies be found in the media, in Congress, in the Oval Office or on the streets of America, they are unworthy of being called “Americans” at all. Those who despise liberty do not deserve liberty. Those who deliberately and maliciously attack the Bill of Rights do not deserve the protections of the Bill of Rights. Those who despise the Constitution and its Bill of Rights are publicly indicating they would prefer to live as subjects, not Citizens.

    I propose that any who attempt to denounce Bill of Rights protections for others must first surrender their own rights and freedoms. Do not speak of taking away my Second Amendment rights while you enjoy the protections of the First Amendment. Surrender all your rights and freedoms first, because only then have you achieved the necessary moral consistency from which you can demand others be deprived of their rights.

    Relocate to North Korea, in other words, and become a subject of Kim Jong-un and then continue your assaults of the Bill of Rights as a Korean gulag blogger. Because only then will you know how much you have lost, and how much you should have valued the liberties you so carelessly abandoned.

    The Bill of Rights is not negotiable. If you oppose it, you betray not only yourself, but all Americans.

  3. diggerdan says:

    They got their law and we got our way of life. I maybe off subject, but I always think of The Beverly Hillbilly`s and what would happen if they tried to take their guns away. Just a visual – I know old Jed or Granny would never give up their guns and honesty for anything.

  4. Steve in Iowa says:

    “Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms
    Act, to include:
    o Background check of owner and any transferee;
    o Type and serial number of the firearm;
    o Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
    o Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that
    possession would not violate State or local law”

    Does that mean if I want to sell my semi-auto rifle the buyer and myself have to go down to the police station, get finger printed, show ID and let them decide if I get to sell the weapon? And we all have to register our semi-auto firearms? I suppose this “new” law will come with an exception for law enforcement? Good, just great, fan-f#@king-tastic to know they’ll be protected at the same time they’re taking my tools of protection from me and my family. Hey, Feinstein, f#@k you. I’m getting tired of being told what I can and cannot do.

  5. NC says:

    That grandfather clause is just put in there until they get this law passed. Then the next law that they will try and put into effect soon after, will be to get rid of the grandfather clause through some other means. Same shit over and over again.

    SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!! What part do you not understand you, Zionist Bitch!??

  6. NC says:

    “120 specifically-named firearms”

    Funny how it doesn’t mention which 120 specifically-named firearms.

    Are they going to tell us or are they just going to let us know when we show them our guns and just say, “Yeah, that’s one of the 120 named ones that are on the ban list” without any documentation or proof. Kinda like how the TSA just puts you on the no-fly list for “120 specifically named” reasons that they can’t tell you until they say, “Yeah that’s one of the 120 reasons” without any documentation or proof.

    Don’t you just love how our government works?

  7. NC says:

    I’m curious. Is it legal for her to be holding up an assault rifle in that building? Isn’t it a violation of some penal code or something? How come she gets to hold up a rifle in a building and not get arrested, yet if I did that, I would be called a terrorist and put in jail. Where’s the justice?

  8. chris says:

    So their going to come confiscate any magazine thats over 10 rounds, bullshit.

    It doesn’t matter whether it’s the weapons themselves or the magazines, I WILL NOT COMPLY.

  9. # 1 NWO Hatr says:

    Crazifornia sure can pick ‘em.

    ESPECIALLY when it comes to female so-called ‘politicians’.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What is 3 + 14 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)