Its an Illusion – A lecture in law by John Harris


Published on Nov 6, 2012 by WonkaaVision

This is a lecture by John Harris about common law, Statutory Law, Admiralty law. Basically the Law Society uses a language against you without you knowing the definitions to and therefor trick you into consenting to contract with them. All conversations are contracts, you have to be carefull what you say when talking to someone in a position of authority as they use a language called legalese. The tricky bastards use the same words as are found in English language, but in their stupid fucking heads decided to give these words different definitions in thier language called legalese. These words only have power over you if you do not know there meaning so i suggest you start to learn their satanic language(Legalese). The language of the law society.

This can also be viewed at www.bbc5.tv website.

For further research:

Freedom is more than a seven letter word – by Veronica Chapman.

http://www.yourstrawman.com/VeronicaC…

12 thoughts on “Its an Illusion – A lecture in law by John Harris

  1. good info. I seen this a while back. Its all true.

    I just was looking up dnb.com and found all the usual suspects including the town I am in listed. The cops. the congress, the state, ALL OF THEM.

    I disagree with him about one thing, that this will require some people to stop existing.

    1. I just checked, Ntb. Turns out I have 2 of his dvds… “It’s an Illusion – The Lawful Rebellion Conference” and “It’s an Illusion ll – The Illusion of Reality”.

      I also have 3 dvds by his Canadian counterpart, Robert A. Menard – “Magnificent Deception”, “Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception” and “Security of the Persons – Reclaiming the Millions the Government Legally Owes You”.

      They all basically deal with the strawman/corporate fiction invention.

      I have to admit, it is one of the most fascinating (and devious) facets of the NWO that I have researched. Spent quite a bit of time (and money) on this one.

        1. There is a process by which you can extricate yourself from the corporate fictional prison, Millard, but it’s no longer viable. They used to honor it if you figured out the game, and played strictly by their rules, but I found out a couple years too late.

          I paid $115 for an outstanding book that thoroughly explained the strawman/corporate fiction (the title escapes me at the moment). The author also offered to do this process for a $700 fee. When I called to inquire (I was absolutely prepared to do this), I was told they had to send me a ‘revision’ of the NWO’s agenda before starting. Turned out that item # 4 on the list was that the Treasury Dept. was/is now sending ALL inquiries related to this particular process directly to the Dept. of Terrorist Threat Div.(near as I can remember, close to that, anyway).

          Considering all that I had learned about the NWO up to that point, I decided that since they were no longer even honoring their original commitment in this matter, there wasn’t much use in going forward with the process.

          $700 is a LOT of money on a bet.

          1. In the second “patriot act” it was stated that anyone claiming self-sovereignty and there for renouncing a “citizenship” could be charged with some BS crime as an enemy combatant. It had to do with IRS and treasury dept. 5 years ago I could have told you the page number. If you dont file a tax return under PAT2 you are considered a terrorist and no geneva convention applies.
            I too was looking into it and had a friend/mentor who had done it back in the 80s but after having kids he was forced back into the system if he wanted to keep his kids. Some ex-wife issue. Anyways…

            Since they made it “illegal” for me to “lawfully” withdraw my(perceived) consent from their system I have considered myself a political prisoner. Ipso facto an “enemy combatant”.
            Now I just refuse to sign EVERYTHING(unless I cross out the parts I dont consent to or sign “BY:gof#@kyourself) and I hold everyone’s tongues when someone uses the name list on a document my mother traded me for.bitch.

          2. What intrigued me the most was the fact that once you took control of your corporate fiction (by way of copyright) you could then proceed to send ALL your bills directly to the Treasury Dept., and it had to pay those bills out of a hidden fund in your name that was created with your stock… excuse me… birth certificate.

          3. I think you mean trademark.
            It is not lawful to copywrite a name by itself. I took music business law which does not make me an expert but copywrite and contracts where the main focus. A copywrite is issued for the content of a “work” and has the creator of the work named.
            It isnt easy to trademark a name unless it is synonymous with an active corporation(ex. ralph laren). You would half to prove a corporation exists in that name and that you own the rights to it and it is in good standing meaning you pay your yearly filing fee and maintain a balance sheet/ledger and all taxes and levies are current.

            BUT your signature is a mark that can very easily be trademarked. Not really sure how that gets ‘fed’ to pay bills ‘you’ incur. It would allow you to seek restitution anytime they print a document with your signature on it.

          4. “Not really sure how that gets ‘fed’ to pay bills ‘you’ incur.”

            “The way to correctly have claims discharged with the IRS as well as in the public sector using the UCC contract trust is to present by the secured party a bonded registered Bill of Exchange, and this needs to be sent straight to the Secretary of the Treasury.

            When a claim is made either by the IRS, a federal or state taxing agency. The claim can then have a stamp imprinted upon it stating “Accepted For Value”. This needs to be done by the secured party and it must be sent through Certified (or Registered) mail directly to the Secretary of the Treasury to be discharged.”

            It deals with the UCC mostly, but I’m pretty sure copyrighting your all capital letter fictional corporate name is part o the process. It’s been a few years since I read the book, but I’ll dig it out and check.

        2. In admiralty law or code/statute law
          If ever person who is issued a ticket went to court instead of paying the fine uncontested the system would choke and spend a lot of money to get the same or less amount they are use to getting. Then everybody refuses to except ownership of their legal name making the court do the research to prove who you are(5th amendment). Then ask the judge if YOU are guaranteed a fair and impartial hearing and when he says “yes” ask him who pays him and who pays the DA(both answers are “the people” or “the state”etc)meaning you cant get a fair hearing when two of three parties are paid(have interest) in you not winning despite facts and evidence. Ask the judge to recuse himself. HE wont. Then force all evidence to be admitted including witness testimony. Ask any cop or “public servant” who testifies as a witness “IS IT YOUR TESTIMONY that…” and the DA and judge with direct the officer not to answer because he is “law dumb” and you pre-loading the question with very dangerous words shows you are about to impeach a “state” witness. If he fails to testify Iv read you can sue his bond for issuing false statements. Keep asking the judge for the case to be dismissed at every chance. Then when found guilty despite the chaos, refuse to pay and do strait time (1-30days normally).
          NOW. why do all that you may ask? The fact is you will most likely not get too far before they let you go or toss you in the clink for contempt of court. BUT it would bleed the system dry on day 3 and contempt charges can be reviewed making every word uttered in that room now on display as evidence and public record. Including the judge admitting he is not impartial and a cop refused to testify because he was afraid of getting caught lying.

          Or just light fires…lol

  2. as stated the meanings of the words I.e. the rule book is changed when holes are discovered and rather than getting wrapped in the minutia simple non participation would win the day.

    the only impediment is everyone around us who in ignorance pupetuate the chains upon their fellow man.

    1. * perpetuate

      can’t type with a thumb.

      and to add :
      a cursory Dun & Bradstreet search will likely turn up your local church as a registrant as well.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*