Landmark Supreme Court Case

Sent to us by a reader.

Supreme Court Case

Relying on the provisions of the Constitution as ultimate proof, the petition presents incontrovertible evidence that no contemporary federal court has jurisdiction anywhere within the exterior limits of any of the 50 freely associated compact states of the Union.

This means that federal law is enforceable only in the District of Columbia and the Territories—and every United States District Judge in every United States District Court throughout the Union is usurping exercise of jurisdiction in extra-constitutional geographic area and culpable for treason to the Constitution:  

“We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. . . .” Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264, 6 Wheat. 265, 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821).

THERE IS NO ONE ON EARTH WHOSE LIFE IS NOT AFFECTED BY THIS SITUATION.

* * *

1 – Supreme Court No. 14-1305, Petition for Writ of Certiorari, filed April 29, 2015

2 – ‘Petition,’ ‘writ,’ and ‘certiorari’ defined

3 – Proof of Service on Solicitor General – April 29, 2015

4 – Solicitor General waives right to file response – May 12, 2015

5 – Update – May 18, 2015

6 – Supreme Court Docket – May 19, 2015

7 – Update – May 21, 2015

https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/

2 thoughts on “Landmark Supreme Court Case

  1. I started looking at the linked documents, but I really can’t spend the morning deciphering legalese.

    From what I did read, it looks like this confirms the lack of federal jurisdiction anywhere outside of D.C., and that’s a good thing.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*