When Obama uttered those words, “..fundamentally transform America” I knew he meant it. It was Obama himself who stated (emphases added), “As radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least, as it’s been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the States can’t do to you; says what the Federal Government can’t do to you, but doesn’t state what the Federal government or State Government must do on your behalf.” (Barack Obama, June 18, 2001).
What to do?
Since, at least philosophy- and policy-wise, one can take Obama at his word, one may get a clue as to Obama’s plans by again, studying his own non-TelePrompter inspired rhetoric:
We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded. — Barack Obama, July, 2008.
Yeah — remember that phrase? Neither did a lot of other people. Like the rest of Obama’s sordid past and rhetoric that if brought to the light of day would have rendered his election impossible, the media (true to their sycophantic nature) pretty much glossed over that little tidbit. A powerful civilian security force. Remind you of anyone?
Why can’t we rely on our military? What are the national security objectives?
Look into a mirror. See that target on your forehead?
You are the only resistance. It is you and the Patriot beside you, your tribe, those who believe in liberty. Will you resist?
You are the resistance.