listen here

Patriot Broadcast From the Trenches Schedule 

Senate to vote on the Federal Land Seizure Act on Thursday

Gun Owners of America

Senator Jon Tester (D-MT) — who is “F” rated by Gun Owners of America — is pushing a “hunting” bill that authorizes the Obama administration almost unlimited power to seize private lands for “environmental” purposes.

Anti-gun Majority Leader Harry Reid has scheduled Tester’s bill for a vote, and it will probably take place on Thursday.

ACTION:  It is imperative that gun owners contact their Senators and ask them to OPPOSE S. 3525.  Click here to tell them that the modest conservation gains allowed in the bill are totally offset by giving unelected bureaucrats the authority to steal land from hunters and private property owners.

BACKGROUND

(1) When the “wetlands” provisions of the Clean Water Act were originally enacted, no one could have foreseen that a landowner would go to prison for applying clean dirt to a junkyard adjacent to a sewer, which was determined to be “wetlands.”  But environmentalists have been brilliant in taking seemingly innocuous programs and massively expanding them through fraudulent interpretations or tiny loopholes.

(2) S. 3525 has “sweeteners.” It allows archery bows to be transported through national parks under very limited circumstances, although Obama could do this by administrative fiat.  It also allows, but does not mandate, Pittman-Robertson funds to be used for target ranges. But none of these small discretionary provisions offset the potential damage this does to the rights of individual landowners.

(3) THE ISSUE OF LOST OPPORTUNITY:  If this is the Democrats’ sop to gun owners, it may make it a lot more difficult to secure national concealed carry reciprocity or to stop anti-gun measures and treaties.

THE CENTRAL PROBLEM WITH S. 3525

The central problem with the bill is that it allows seizure of private lands for “aquatic habitats” [Sections 201(8) and 204 (d) (2)]. The definition of this term is limitless and includes seizure of lands in order to “protec[t] the quality and quantity of water sources” and to “serv[e] as a buffer protecting the aquatic environment.” [Section 201 (2)]

Thus, a factory that “pollutes” can be seized to protect an “aquatic habitat.” The only real limit on seizure in Section 204 is the requirement that the government manage the seized property “in accordance with the purposes of this subtitle.”

WHO ARE THE DECISION MAKERS?

The National Fish Habitat Board consists of 27 members. The initial members (Obama appointees) select the remaining members. Thus while the “commercial fishing industry” supposedly has a representative, you can bet that that fisherman is an Obama-supporter and will support his agenda.

The board then enters into “partnerships” with, inter alia, outside groups. And you can bet that every liberal environmental organization in the country will now be feeding at this pig sty. The outside groups recommend fish habitat programs and plans for seizing private lands.

Bottom line:  This will give immense powers to unelected bureaucrats — a clear violation of the Separation of Powers which our Founders implemented as a way of protecting our rights.

WHAT ABOUT SECTION 211 (e) (2)?

This supposedly requires the consent of landowners prior to having their lands seized. But, note the sneaky loophole: Section 211 (e) (2) applies only to property that is being seized with federal funds and, under Section 204 (e), half the funds need to come from non-federal sources.

So while this section is put forward as a “protection,” it actually doesn’t provide total immunity because the government can take a land owner’s property using non-federal funds — and there is no protection in the bill against that.

Click here to contact your Senators

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.
2458
Don't forget to answer the Security Question before you post comment.

3 Responses to Senate to vote on the Federal Land Seizure Act on Thursday

  1. NC says:

    So now they are taking more of our land under Agenda 21. Is there anything else besides my life that this SOB wants to take away from me before I die? Unbelievable.

  2. carl hammel says:

    As I understand it international banks seized all the land in 1933 when the United States(Nation)filed bankruptcy to the Federal Reserve (private bank.)This is when we inherited the birth certificate and the straw man.We are like livestock traded on the psychopath exchange.Check out birth certificate bond,whether the UNITED STATES is a nation or a corporation,whether the UNITED STATES actually employs a judge or if they are only administrators for the corporation.You have no Constitutional rights under the queen’s maritime law.On top of that the Constitution confers no rights upon anyone,but rather at times eloquently relates that rights are inalienable and natural upon creation.The individual citizens of a nation are the final arbiters of that Nation’s constitution.Government doesn’t dictate law and morality upon citizens in a free society but rather vice versa.In closing,I am not CARL HAMMEL

  3. Elena says:

    Does it really matter whether they pass it or not? It’s already happening on the local level, Local Agenda 21, ICLEI. Check out how congress is being bypassed by implementation of the “plans” “visions” “abstracts” that all promote Sustainable Living per AG21. All being implemented through the parasitic Public Private Partnerships financed by govt “grants”…OUR money! See Granite County MT seizing retired Vet’s property on http://www.tvfmontana.org. Why the seizure? Because he had the “audacity” to question the county’s implementation of zoning his property. Was it done in accordance with the County Growth policy, as approved by vote of the people? Or per the commission’s discretion under the guidance of an association backdooring AG21?.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What is 4 + 13 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)