listen here

Patriot Broadcast From the Trenches Schedule 

The Question Feinstein, Cuomo, Bloomberg Don’t Consider & The Media Won’t Ask

AmmoLand – by Dan Roberts

USA --(Ammoland.com)- How many Citizens is the government willing to kill in the push for firearms disarmament?

As debate continues around the Country and in the Capitol about new and draconian gun control laws there is a glaring, as yet unaddressed question that those in Congress and the Pro Gun Control side seem incapable of even considering and the media hasn’t even begun to ask.

Just how many Citizens, having committed no crime other then peaceful non compliance with an Unconstitutional and treasonous gun control scheme are the gun grabbers willing to kill in furtherance of their agenda?

NY State Rep Jerry Nadler, during an interview about the proposed Feinstein / Cuomo mandatory buyback scheme was quoted as saying he thought the very idea was “insane“.

Which itself is damning evidence that those in favor of gun control, be they politicians or the media are arrogantly dismissive of, and not even considering the possibility of resistance to their plans.

And not considering the very real possibilities of defensive violence against oppressive government is a sure sign that people like Adler, Feinstein, Lautenberg, McCarthy and their followers are completely unfit to hold positions of high Office.

It shows they are so convinced of their power, that the idea of someone not complying with their edicts is alien to them. It reveals they are so hopelessly out of touch with the American people that they have either no idea how people really feel or simply don’t care and will happily enact whatever laws they feel like, and if a few million people die as a result? Oh well. No rational and sane person, especially not someone that views themselves as a “leader” would so crassly dismiss even the most unlikely of unintended consequences to their actions.

The fact of the matter is, there are in fact millions of Americans who will not comply with ANY new gun control laws and are willing to risk and if necessary, sacrifice their lives defending themselves from oppressive aggression at the hands of the State.

Feinstein, Bloomberg, Lautenberg, and the rest are coward, plain and simple. No one sees them offering to give up their 24/7/365 security details (armed with actual “assault weapons” , while they demand the “little people” be disarmed.) That’s what a true leader does, sets the example with their own conduct and choices as an example for others to emulate.

You wont see Rham Emmanuel, Barbara Boxer, Sheila Jackson Lee or any of the leaders of the Anti Gun Side going door to door to demand Citizens turn in their firearms. No, they’ll stay safely ensconced behind their walls, with their armed security guards and send others to do their dirty work.

For all their talk about “wanting to save lives” , those at every level of the Gun control movement are quite happy to sacrifice however many lives it takes, on both sides of the issue, on the altar of their ideology.

There is nothing immoral about a Citizen defending themselves, with force if necessary, from the aggressive actions of the State.

After being arrested and sent to the gulag for being a “political dissident” Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn had this to say about how the prisoners regretted not fighting back against the Police State :

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

Social media of all types has been abuzz since word first leaked about the Feinstein /Cuomo confiscation plan and only increased in recent days as word got out over the plans for ending the Second Amendment in Illinois, NY State, Iowa and others, of people publicly declaring that they will not comply and will fight if it comes to that.

Things will not end well if Congressional Leaders and others refuse to acknowledge and do not consider and heed these warnings and take them seriously.

During the Revolutionary War, estimates from historical records show that only 3% of the population of the Colonies supported the patriots in their fight against tyrannical rule by Britain.

If only 3% of the 80 million gun owners in the United States stand up and fight back, that is greater then the total of every member of Law Enforcement and the Military combined. And a significant percentage of the Law Enforcement and Military Communities will simply refuse to folllow orders such as confiscating weapons, searching properties without probable cause and a warrant or firing on Citizens whose only desire is to be left alone and have their rights respected.

So the percentage of manpower available to the Government to carry out their plot versus the number of Citizens willing to fight them is even more lopsided in the Citizens favor.

The government actively planned for, assaulted and eventually assassinated those they wanted to make an example of at Ruby Ridge, and Waco Texas, and make no mistake, particularly with regard to Waco and the Branch Dravidians , that was a deliberate, “made for TV” , attack, the State showing the people live and in full color and stereo sound for days, exactly how far they were willing to go, and what they were willing to do, including the murder of children, to send a message to any who would dare resist the forces of Government in the future.

If cooler heads in Congress don’t prevail and put a decisive stop to the evolving plot to disarm Americans who have committed no crimes, because of the isolated actions of a a handful of deranged criminal’s, things are going to reach a point of no return, and there will be enormous amounts of bloodshed on both sides, while those that deliberately set out to engineer and set in motion that violence sit back with a smug smile of satisfaction.

About Dan RobertsDan Roberts is a grassroots supporter of gun rights that has chosen AmmoLand Shooting Sports News as the perfect outlet for his frank, ‘Jersey Attitude’ filled articles on Guns and Gun Owner Rights.As a resident of the oppressive state of New Jersey he is well placed to be able to discuss the abuses of government against our inalienable rights to keep and bear arms as he writes from deep behind NJ’s Anti-Gun iron curtain. Read more from Dan Roberts or email him at DRoberts@ammoland.com You can also find him on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/dan.roberts.18

Read more at Ammoland.com: http://www.ammoland.com/2013/01/the-question-feinstein-cuomo-bloomberg-dont-consider-the-media-wont-ask/#ixzz2HOCEfRv6

This entry was posted in News, Videos. Bookmark the permalink.
2806
Don't forget to answer the Security Question before you post comment.

16 Responses to The Question Feinstein, Cuomo, Bloomberg Don’t Consider & The Media Won’t Ask

  1. oldranger68 says:

    The problem at Waco and Ruby Ridge was that no one came to the defense of the people under siege. A concerted action against those attacking would have altered the outcome significantly and would have told the government that they did an unwise thing.

    I am hoping that we will not allow any action to take our weapons without going to the aid of our neighbors with arms. If they wish to use violence then that is how they will be met.

    When the atrocities at Ruby Ridge and Waco were occurring, I was noticing holes in the Police and Military techniques. They didn’t scare me, which was their aim, they angered me. They can be flanked and stopped.

    • Jolly Roger says:

      Here’s someone I can drink with. The oldranger68 leaves me with nothing to add.

    • chris says:

      HELL YES,

      Swarm and harass

    • NC says:

      I’m with you on that one, Ranger. People need to stop the fear bullshit and come to people’s aid like they used to. Get involved and take action and stop standing there like a bunch of dumbasses taking video footage with your pathetic phone cameras and cowering in the corner like a little coward. “I have you on tape. This is going online.” Who the hell cares!!!?? They are still going to beat the shit out of you and get away with it. TAKE ACTION!!! PHYSICAL ACTION!!! I’m so sick of people standing around in a circle doing nothing with their cameras when witnessing things like this. It’s 30 against 1 or 2 cops. Call me crazy, but I think we can take the cops, people. The people in Greece and Spain are shown kicking the shit out of the cops who mess with them. Why can’t we? GRR!!! It just pisses me off. Sheeple.

    • Anon says:

      Don’t forget Oklahoma City, and WTC 1,2, and 7. Not sure how you would stop THAT.

  2. CXJ says:

    Cheers! OldRanger and JR. Good day…

  3. rhumstruck says:

    Oldranger said it all, NOW,
    Saddle up ladies, this rodeo is about to begin!
    :)

  4. skipNclair barker says:

    there is another question that must be answered, how many of these people that will try to take our guns will die before they realize their mistake. When they start dying and bleeding and learning they are no match for us they will learn.

  5. D'Rosemont says:

    There are rumors that the Chinese and Russians are training on U.S. soil. If this is to help in the gun confiscation, will there be enough of us to take them on? We will need militias from all around the world to join us then.

    • oldranger68 says:

      Never fear. In all seriousness. Militia doesn’t have to have a neat sounding military name and designation. We are militia. And, so you know, these aren’t rumors. I’ve been telling people this for years. These people are housed and fed and entertained on your military bases. Their meager salaries are offset with your taxes. But, and here’s the f#@kin’ kicker, lil’ feller…you’ll know they ain’t us if they start shooting at you. Shit, son. We HAVE militia all over the U.S. They don’t. The Chinese ones will be easy enough to identify, they’ll be the little slanty-eyed ones who are not on your side. Having said that, I hope my wife doesn’t read that cause she’s a slanty-eyed Viet Namese with a poor f#@king sense of humor. Don’t worry, I think she’s on my side.

  6. pete says:

    dont worry about the russians,
    they know more than anyone what it’s like to be overthrown by jews.
    they wont help them.
    i doubt the chinese would either.

    if you want an honest opinion,
    i’d say watch out for IDF (Israeli scum), and mercenaries.
    there was a document many years ago from a guy called joe vials who said that the jews dont want palastine – it’s just a staging point.
    the real “israel” they want is the u.s. & canada.
    (and they dont want any non-jews in it)

  7. Joe says:

    They must know that open, violent, obvious confiscation is suicide for them as well as hurting their political image with moderates. And if they don’t they will by the sound of things.

    Also amazing that the likes of SPLC and FBI know sites like these are no secret, and that folks are openly discussing how to spoil their agenda in the most graphical terms. I guess they think it makes their job a bit easier, when the uppity sheep discuss how to trap and dispatch the wolf so openly.

    But of course a divided, Balkanized, and distracted America is far easier to overthrow, even if heavily armed.

  8. D'Rosemont says:

    Yes, Israelis. That’s another one for sure. Are you speaking to ‘me personally’ when you say “Son”? Or is that just a general way to get your message across?

    Sorry to ask this here, but I’ve signed up to follow 3 blogs now, and am supposed to get email notifications when there are responses, but they aren’t happening. On one page, it says I’m signed up, but on another page it says I’m not, and I cannot find any way to contact wordpress about this. Their ‘help’ page is no help.

    • oldranger68 says:

      I’m an old man. I call most people son or sweetheart and I’m thinking you don’t rate a sweetheart. I was a drill sergeant back in the ’70s and it got to be a habit. Thicken your skin up a bit and don’t take it personal.

  9. m_astera says:

    My guess would be that the subliminal and overt fear brainwashing by the media (TV and AM radio) in the US has been much more effective than in Greece or Spain.

    Based on recent historical evidence, It’s safe to assume that your neighbors will not come to your aid if you are attacked by the government, and that many of them will actually turn you in to the government. Might be wise to take that into consideration when making your plans.

    • oldranger68 says:

      That is very true.

      We’re all saying that we’re different and will not cave when they come. If we’re right then, hopefully, we will change the history. Remember, “…who has learned nothing from history…doomed to repeat history…” I personally prefer not to repeat the same history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What is 14 + 13 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)