listen here

Patriot Broadcast From the Trenches Schedule 

buy gold scottsdale

What Feinstein’s Bill Left Out

feinsteinRed Flag News – by Alan Korwin

The lamestream media told you:

[Composite summary: Sen. Diane Feinstein, a long-time crusader for justice and peace, motivated by unspeakable tragedy, has introduced her wonderful brand new bill designed to make children safe and take those awful killing machines off the street to stop crime and make everyone safer. The powerful gun lobby will fight her because they are evil.]

[NY Times version:] WASHINGTON — by Jennifer Steinhauer — During a lengthy and at times emotionally wrenching news conference, Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California on Thursday announced legislation that would ban the sale and manufacture of 157 types of semiautomatic weapons, as well as magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition…

Surrounded by victims of gun violence, colleagues in the Senate and House and several law enforcement officials, and standing near pegboards with several large guns attached, Ms. Feinstein acknowledged the difficulty in pursuing such legislation, even when harnessing the shock and grief over the shooting of 20 schoolchildren in Newtown, Conn., last month. “This is really an uphill road,” Ms. Feinstein said…]

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

I’ve just finished reading the 122 pages of Diane Feinstein’s latest “gun-control” bill, Senate Bill S.150, and was surprised to find some important things missing.

Even more surprising was one small item briefly mentioned on page 13 that has not been reported in any “news” coverage I have seen. It’s a whopper – it invalidates her entire list of guns, and I’ve written ten books on this topic, I know what I’m saying! — but first, here’s what’s missing:

1. Criminals.

 

Nothing addresses criminals — everything is aimed at innocent people who haven’t done anything wrong. There is not even any “malum in se” (legalese for intent to do wrong) or criminal intention. It is all “malum prohibitum” (wrong because we say so), the worst kind of bureaucratic and government abuse — crime by decree. The critics appear to be right. This is not about gun control, it is purely about control. The bill simply removes the right to own property Americans currently own.

(That’s not completely accurate about criminals; there is one small requirement for anyone carrying a “grandfathered semi-auto ‘assault’ weapon” or having one in ‘such close proximity’ to yourself that you could retrieve it and use it as if you carried it, if a “prohibited possessor” came near, so that the prohibited individual has no ability to access the weapon, or else keep it protected with ‘a secure gun storage or safety device’. Yes, it’s complicated. It seems to mean you can machine gun (or otherwise shoot) criminals without being charged with having a gun near bad people. And of course, prohibited possessors are prohibited.) Licensed importers, manufacturers and dealers are exempt.

2. Crazy People.

 

Please forgive my use of common English — nothing addresses people who are nuts, borderline nuts, formerly nuts or no longer nuts and still perpetually banned from their rights. The entire problem of psychology — screamed about in the media and by politicians — is nowhere to be found in Feinstein’s bill, despite claims and mountains of evidence that this is a root cause of the problem.

Former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, whose husband Mark Kelly testified before Congress today (Wed. Jan. 30, 2013) that she owns a gun, would not be hampered by Feinstein’s bill in any way, even though she is severely brain damaged due to a criminal assault.

3. Drugs Issued By Big Pharma.

 

Despite labels that warn psychotropic drugs may cause psychotic episodes, suicidal tendencies, manic behavior, sudden death and various social and psychological disturbances, this is unaddressed in the democrat’s proposed solution to mass murder by people hopped up on psychologically prescribed medications. Reports indicate that virtually all the mass murders were “deaths under the influence” (DUI) it is missing in the bill, an omission of Feinsteinian proportions. (The Citizens Commission on Human Rights International has a researched list of perps and their drugs here:http://www.cchrint.org/tag/columbine)

4. Make-Believe Gun-Free Zones.

 

Overwhelming evidence repeatedly and clearly demonstrates that the massacres driving the frenzy toward civil-rights infringement occur in these make-believe gun-free zones, yet no inkling of an effort to reduce or mitigate this problem is addressed in Mrs. Feinstein’s proposed hardware solution. “If we don’t address the problem, how can we hope for a solution,” one expert democrat asked, who requested anonymity to avoid retribution from her fellow party members.

5. Revolvers.

 

Mrs. Feinstein appears to have completely overlooked normal capacity, fast-shooting revolvers, that can release a powerful volley of dangerous hollowpoint cop-killer bullets. We don’t want her to expand her list of course, but her plan is deliberately “allowing” criminals to murder people everywhere using her approved list of guns — the ones she hasn’t banned yet. The ones, like six-guns, cowboys used in every bloody Western you’ve ever watched. Why would she do such a reckless thing? She could not be reached for comment before press time.

For that matter, why is Mrs. Feinstein and her supporters in the press and elsewhere so intent on arming everyone with ten-shooters (the bill calls for a free market in sales of ten-round magazines)? Why isn’t anyone questioning that? That makes no sense at all. If the goal is to protect innocent defenseless little doe-eyed children, which everyone agrees is a really good idea, forcing psychopaths to use ten-shooters is a really bad idea. Steps should be taken to disarm criminals completely. Fortunately, current law covers that completely.  This bill does absolutely nothing in that regard.

6. Gun Safety.

 

Nothing in her 122-page bill deals with gun safety. No training, no marksmanship, nothing for teachers, no self-defense awareness, no public education, nothing for schools, everything the president has asked for to increase child safety is missing in her long list of guns she would remove from the hands of the innocent. Even the slightest measure of increased gun safety is missing in her plans. Maybe it’s just an oversight and will come in floor negotiations and the inevitable amendments. The chilling suggestion that her bill is just cover so that less extreme bills will seem moderate could not be confirmed as we went to press.

7. Constitutional Validity.

 

Every aspect of this bill appears to be an infringement on the Bill Of Rights, with no legitimate justification. Congress cannot pass infringements by majority vote. That is forbidden, although the word “infringement” itself is universally missing in “news” reports, in case you haven’t noticed.

Congress can’t just enact whatever they want by majority rule. If they could, we would not have government of limited delegated powers, the hallmark of freedom and The American Way. It must just be a typo, on page two, continuing for 121 pages. If it’s not a typo, it is grounds for removal from office for violation of her oath of office. Boy, would that be an embarrassment.

Read more here: http://redflagnews.com/headlines/must-read-key-items-missing-in-feinsteins-gun-bill-by-alan-korwin

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.
5367
Don't forget to answer the Security Question before you post comment.

14 Responses to What Feinstein’s Bill Left Out

  1. Eomer says:

    Can you please start blurring out her face when you post these articles? She’s got a face that could stop a train dead in it’s tracks. I’m sick of having to spit out these bits of throw up everytime I see this hag.

  2. Frank says:

    They are called usurpers. You sound like a defeatist or perish the thought a troll. Sorry,just my opinion. Can I still have one?

  3. Henry Shivley says:

    Frank and pepe,
    We definitely get the cream of the crop when it comes to trolls. They will come on and swear that they are patriots and do so many times over for just one chance to get a commie comment past us. This one was only up for a half hour.
    I wonder how much of our tax money is being used to pay these guys.

  4. Mike says:

    Definition of “infringe” – Act so as to limit or undermine…

    This bill limits magazine capacities and the types of firearms that are currently legal, therefore, it falls under the definition of “infringe”.

    Why not stop beating around the bush and simply introduce a bill to repeal the Second Amendment? At least she can stop hiding her true intentions.

  5. Dave says:

    We should stop getting distracted with our constant complaining of “these laws won’t do anything, they have nothing to do with who it is that’s committing these crimes”, etc.
    The gun grabbers KNOW THAT!
    They don’t give a rats ass about “the children”, they only want us unarmed for THEIR benefit.

    This is why we must give them NOTHING!
    No deals, No, Sacrifices, No compromise.
    These people are truly out to render us as vulnerable as those in the Soviet Union in 1917 (ironically by the same tribe!), and many other examples that ended in tragedy

  6. Mike says:

    I don’t think this lady sees the financial impact of this. None of them do. Her gun ban would destroy this companies arms industry. All of the companies who assist are in the manufacture communities. All gun sales shops and ranges. I for one am boycotting Walmart, Dicks, and B of A for the rest of my life.
    On top of all of this is most of the guns in this country are built in the worst gun controlled states. Springfield Armory, Colt, Kimber to name just some important ones. Kimber is in Yonkers NY for that matter which has the worst state gun laws now. Which is located in a county that has the worst gun laws in that state. WTF. Everyone of these companies should move out of state. Move to a state that cares about the second amendment. It would drop the tax revenue in these areas dramatically. That should send a huge FU to these law (breakers) makers. Maybe then they will get the message.

  7. Miguel Grande says:

    I believe moving expenses are still tax deductible. Colt, Remington, Ruger, Winchester, etc. should pack up and move their factory to a state that enforces the 10th Amendment and the 2nd. Send the bill to the govt.

  8. SamAdams says:

    Jewsus commands that you give up your sovereignty and bow before the coming lord commie. China will show you how as you reap what you sow.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What is 4 + 5 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)