listen here

Patriot Broadcast From the Trenches Schedule 

donations

10 things the media don’t want to discover about Sandy Hook

sandyhookfenceJon Rappaport

Slashing through the bland authoritative front the media have presented, people want to know more about the Sandy Hook massacre. But the elite networks have no intention of answering the most obvious questions.

Why? Because the follow-up agenda of gun control is all important, and the official Sandy Hook scenario must stand, in order to forward that agenda.

Any return to the scene of the crime will:

divert media coverage from its all-out push to make guns into taboo objects of scorn, ridicule, fear, and hatred;

focus attention on reasons for the massacre that have nothing to do with guns;

engender deep distrust of the Sandy Hook police investigation and therefore, by association, throw into doubt the notion that law-enforcement personnel should be the only people carrying guns in America.

Here are 10 things the media doesn’t want to know about and has no intention of investigating. These are only the basics, amid a wider sea of unanswered questions:

Where is the video footage from inside the Sandy Hook Elementary School, footage that surely exists and shows some part of the massacre? Who has that video record? What does the video reveal? Where is the video (or photo) evidence that Adam Lanza was the shooter?

How did the accused killer, Lanza, gain entrance to the school? Having just installed a new security system that required outside (and presumably heavy) doors to be locked, and with a procedure for entry that demanded two-way video communication with the principal’s office—what exactly happened?

From available information, it seems almost certain Lanza was seeing a doctor and was on medication. Who was the doctor and what drugs did he prescribe? Did they include SSRI antidepressants like Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil, or Ritalin and Adderall—drugs known to cause violent behavior, including suicide and homicide. If so, then all the focus would shift to excoriating the drugs and eliminating them from our society.

What was the exact story on the two or three other suspects captured and detained by the police? Who are they? Why were they pursued? What did their questioning reveal? Why were they released? No vague generalities. Instead, all the details. And let’s have in-depth television interviews with these suspects.

Once and for all, let’s have a definitive statement on what guns were used in the killings and what guns were found in the trunk of the car. So many lies and contradictions were floated, it’s a sea of confusion. So let’s have the facts—and evidence to back them up. For starters, let’s see photos of the killer and his weapons taken inside the school. Undoctored photos.

What is the detailed explanation for the massive shift from Lanza’s father being killed in New Jersey to Lanza’s mother being killed in Connecticut? No vague generalities. No nonsense about “typical early confusion” in reporting. Let’s see the whole chain of information and the people who forwarded it. Similarly, if the early conclusion pointed to Adam’s brother Ryan as the killer, a conclusion which was withdrawn because Adam was carrying his brother’s ID, explain that. According to reports, Adam hadn’t seen his brother in more than two years. Offer hard evidence that Adam was, in fact, carrying his brother’s ID.

Where are complete statements and interviews with witnesses who were in the school at the time of the shooting? We have seen a few short interviews. There must be more. Let’s have them or get them. Are we to believe (as independent investigator Mike Powell has rightly doubted) that one teacher stuffed all her children into classroom cabinets, which ordinarily are filled with school supplies?

In the television interviews with parents of children murdered in the Sandy Hook School, not one parent was angry, not one parent demanded a deeper investigation. Obviously, this screening of interviewees was purposeful. Where are the outraged parents? What do they have to say? Do they know anything we don’t know? Have they been told (as people were at Columbine) to keep quiet?

And now, as the gun-control agenda is being pursued, precisely how will new laws curb the majority of gun violence in America, violence which is taking place in cities—much of it gang-related. Explain why President Obama doesn’t vigorously and publicly target these high-crime areas, if his objective is to reduce the gun violence, rather than gun ownership.

The pending and often postponed Chicago trial of Jesus Niebla, high-ranking member of the Mexican Sinaloa drug cartel, experiences delay after delay. What vital facts are being kept from the public? There are serious defense charges here; namely, that Niebla and other Sinaloa members have received permanent immunity from prosecution in a prior deal with the DEA and FBI, in return for supplying information on rival cartels. In fact, the US federal government has obtained a suppression of defense-attorney documents in the trial, claiming their exposure would violate National Security.

Does Sinaloa have explicit US government permission to deliver tons of cocaine and heroin into Chicago, and then to cities all over America? This enterprise would certainly, as a side effect, produce a significant amount of gun violence. Does the federal government really want to curb this violence, or is its arrangement with Sinaloa taking precedence?

Finally, in the wake of Sandy Hook, how does President Obama’s declaration that mental-health services will be expanded across America add up to reduction of gun violence? In fact, this will lead to higher levels of prescribed dangerous psychiatric drugs, which in turn will cause a serious escalation in gun violence and mass shootings.

Major media don’t want to know anything about these points. And yet they’re betting they will retain the public trust. But the fact that their ratings are sinking, month after month, year after year, is a message from the public.

The media refuse to hear it, though. They glide through their rehearsed paces and pretend they are captains of information. Their elite owners would prefer to let the media ship go down, rather than tell the truth.

That’s understandable. After all, these owners, and the owners who own them, are guilty of all sorts of crimes, the reporting of which would make ratings soar but destroy their own empires, reputations, and lives.

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails atwww.nomorefakenews.com

http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/02/09/10-things-the-media-dont-want-to-discover-about-sandy-hook/

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.
3651
Don't forget to answer the Security Question before you post comment.

5 Responses to 10 things the media don’t want to discover about Sandy Hook

  1. how “Jewish”…

    http://archive.adl.org/PresRele/Mise_00/5368_00.htm

    got a bumper sticker for that…?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_XK3Nh8N88A

    calling Gordon Kahl

    http://historyrfd.net/isern/431/kahl.htm

    Gordon Kahl was a low-income farmer not even meeting minimal statutory standards for threshold income levels achieved before being required to file 1040s, but that was not about to stop the IRS, who is good at changing the facts by creating facts.

    Convicted and incarcerated, when out of Leavenworth Federal Penitentiary on parole, Kahl left the Texas judicial district he was confined to by claiming that some aspect of the Restriction Orders was defective. He soon moved to North Dakota — and there, he met his fate. A criminal Summons issued from a Federal Court in Midland, Texas was served on Gordon Kahl on August 8, 1980, charging him with a misdemeansor. Gordon Kahl responded by informing the Court that he would not be appearing, and the matter was allowed to be deferred until March 31, 1982, when the Justice Department obtained a Federal Arrest Warrant citing his parole violation.

    http://www.chabad.org/holidays/purim/article_cdo/aid/648312/jewish/Purim-2013-Guide.htm

    {how do Gog & Magog KHAZARS get to 400BC ?}

    Then, that Warrant was held up again until July 26, 1982, some 16 months later, when it was sent to the U.S. Marshals Office in Fargo, North Dakota on February 13, 1983. The United States Marshals and the Federal Court in Texas knew of his whereabouts in North Dakota at all times. After a two and one half year delay in the case, the fact that there was a “problem” controlling the prosecution of the case is self-evident.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvS_HLx6NaM

    go figure….got a polaroid of Dallas Cowboys at the Alamo ?

  2. Jolly Roger says:

    the Sandy Hook incident has entered what I call “conspiracy theory mode.”

    Watch out for all kinds of ridiculous claims being made that will be used to discredit all who question the official story. This is the tactic used when too much truth starts to leak out.

    Anyone working to expose this hoax should probably stick to one piece of easily proven evidence. I would suggest the United Way’s appeal for donations being posted a day before the shootings. It’s easily proven, easy to convey to someone else, and hard to dispute that there was definite planning of the event by a powerful group of people.

    What you’ll see now is a hundred “activists” forwarding all kinds of crazy “evidence” and encouraging others to dwell on minutia rather then spreading the truth, and everyone questioning or exposing the hoax will be portrayed as one gang of lunatics who deserve to be mocked by the media. (which is probably already happening, but I don’t read much MSM propaganda, so I can’t know for sure)

  3. Big Jay says:

    Oh the “early confusion” BS of the so-called journalists of today.
    As a former TV guy myself, I DO NOT accept this explanation. The news directors, reporters, producers and all who are involved with news shows should know better. NEVER, EVER report a tidbit of information without first confirming it. NEVER!
    Today’s competitive atmosphere, for the promotion department, is to boast “WE GOT IT FIRST!” How about boasting “WE GOT IT RIGHT!” No, because the numbskulls watching thier pap do not know any better. The are programmed to believe “first is best.”
    Television news, or what passes for it is really Entertainment Tonight with some hard, serious stuff.
    Thanks to God more people are waking up to their bilge and heading for the Internet for some degree of accuracy.
    Get away from the local TV news. They are nothing more than “repeaters” of the big boys’ nonsense.

  4. Steve says:

    When some of the students were interviewed afterwards and asked what they heard they said “it sounded like someone was kicking a door” I’ll tell you this if a AR was fired in a school building it would sound like a cannon. A 100 shots fired and it sounded like someone was kicking the door? The kids would of pissed themselves from the shots fired and the screams of students. I’m a Middle schools teacher and once a student lit a firecracker in the hall and it echoed down the hall and all the teachers poured out of their classrooms to find out what happened.

  5. Manuel says:

    Check this and it will raise your eyebrows to the top of your head:

    http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter210.htm

    Adam Lanza registered as dead ONE DAY BEFORE THE SHOOTING !!!!????

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What is 10 + 6 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)