California appeals court remands challenge to gun microstamping law

Sent to us by Glayd.

Jurist

California’s 5th District Court of Appeals[official website] on Thursday reversed and remanded [opinion, PDF] a lower court ruling which rejected a challenge to a state law requiring gun microstamping. In 2007 then-governor Arnold Schwarzenegger [official profile] signed a bill[materials] intended to combat gun trafficking and ease crime investigations involving bullet casings. The bill required [AP report] gun manufacturers to double-mark semiautomatic pistols with “a microscopic array of characters” that would identify the weapon and imprint on inserted cartridges when fired. The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) and the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute (SAAMI) [advocacy websites] later challenged the law, stating that microstamping guns on two different areas is technologically impossible. According to the gun manufacturers, only the firing pin can be marked as required by the law, and such a marking would lead to unreliable imprinting results. The state argued that the law can be satisfied by double-marking the safety pin. Justice Herbert Levy stated, however, that such double-marking would not satisfy the law’s legislative intent since imprinting could be prevented by simply removing the firing pin. Levy concluded that “it is unreasonable to require an individual to attempt what is impossible to accomplish.” The matter will now return to the lower court, where the manufacturers will be able present evidence supporting the technological impossibility of the law’s requirements.

Gun control and the Second Amendment continue to be controversial topics across the US. Last month voters in California, Nevada and Washington approved [JURIST report] a host of new gun control measures while one such measure in Maine failed to pass. In September the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit restored[JURIST report] gun ownership rights of two individuals convicted of minor crimes. In June the US Supreme Court ruled [JURIST report] that a state law conviction on reckless domestic assault is sufficient to bar possession of a firearm under federal law. Earlier in June Hawaii Governor David Ige signed a bill [JURIST report] requiring gun owners to be listed on an FBI database, notifying police if a Hawaii citizen is arrested in another state and providing a continuous criminal record check on those individuals seeking to possess a firearm. Also in June the US Supreme Court denied certiorari [JURIST report] in two separate cases challenging bans on assault-style weapons. The court denied the appeals without comment, letting stand lower court rulings that had upheld the bans [JURIST report] as constitutional.

http://www.jurist.org/paperchase/2016/12/california-court-remands-challenge-to-gun-microstamping-law.php#.WEQ0COF958A.mailto

7 thoughts on “California appeals court remands challenge to gun microstamping law

  1. Microstamping laws are idiotic to be sure, but the tyrannical intent is clear enough. Even if such laws passed, they’d be easily circumvented.

    If I wanted to shoot someone and not get caught, I wouldn’t leave any casings behind in the first place. Revolvers, bolt-action rifles, and pump shotguns make that easy.

    Also important, I would never allow my bare skin (or any item that has ever touched my bare skin) to contact the rounds loaded into the gun. DNA can be left behind that way, especially if you’re using your bare thumb to press rounds into a magazine.

    1. “If I wanted to shoot someone and not get caught, I wouldn’t leave any casings behind in the first place.”

      Anxiously awaiting the day that will become totally immaterial.

  2. Any barrel can have it’s lands and grooves altered enough to completely destroy forensic matches(i.e. striations) to it’s projectile with appx 100 strokes of the brass wire cleaning brush. That’ll help in a clandestine approach. But yeah, me too. It being immaterial is the point where the People can operate as a Republic and gsd.

    1. I wouldn’t even worry about the striations too much, since they only come into play if the pigs get their hands on either your gun or another bullet they know was fired from it.

      There are also guns out there with quick-change barrels (like LMT’s awesome ARs). And of course smooth bore shotguns leave no striations.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*