Meet the Woman Who Wants to Reduce The Male Population by 90% “For Peace”



Sent to us by a reader.

News Forage

Meet a 22-year-old, southern criminology student with a three-year-old child. She calls herself the Femitheist and has a blog, YouTube channel, and is writing a book all about the “importance” of reducing the male population to roughly 1-10% in order to achieve world peace and “true equality.” Somehow, she expects this to end war, rape, and violence in general. Though this seems like trying to end violence by committing violence – because it is – she asserts that it is “the only logical solution.” Terrifyingly, she has spawned a gaggle of followers that believe in selective breeding, male-only abortions, and an International Castration Day. She asserts that men of all ages would need to attend a castration ceremony, and murdered if they refuse. Don’t worry, though, the men’s spouses and mothers have the option to “milk the male” before castration if they want a sperm sample.

Nothing says “peace” quite like genital mutilation, eugenics, and murder. Oh, and slavery. There’s slavery, too.

Toby McCasker over at Vice decided to go boldly where probably no man ought to go (safety purposes) and conducted an interview to try and get a better understanding of all this hullabaloo. Due to the fact that it is probably one of the most terrifying things I’ve ever read – it’s like a combination of 1984, Brave New World, and the Communist Manifesto…but with “feminism” – I’ve decided to include the interview in it’s entirety below.

She’s also 200 pages into what she’s hoping will be her 700 page manifesto outlining the philosophy of Femitheism. It’s tentatively titled The Ratio.
VICE: I assume The Ratio refers to your belief the male population should be reduced to between by 90 percent.
The Femitheist: I believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class—a far more valued class—having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio. That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death.
Assuming people are down for that, how could you reduce the male population by that much? Are you talking culling or selective breeding over years?
Obviously men comprise a substantial portion of the victims of violent crime and participate heavily in war, so there will always be deaths there—but certainly not culling. I don’t advocate selective slaughter or brutal processes.
So how would you achieve it?
Further research into designer babies will be necessary: manipulating gender or sex, prenatal sex discernment, sex-selective abortions, development of dual-female progeny (babies created from two mothers), and numerous other mechanisms will be utilised in order to achieve these aspirations. They won’t be enforced or mandated to achieve the goal in the short-term, but merely heavily encouraged in the early stages. Unless one opposes abortion, there’s little ethical reason to find that too outrageous a proposition. The maths has already been done on all of the genetic and population-sustainment-related issues: population bottleneck, inbreeding, mutations, et cetera. Everything works out in favour of my ideas. I’ve been meticulous and cautious. I’ve had the work reviewed by people who are experts—or at least extremely knowledgeable—in biology and genetics, and I’ve received confirmation that it all works out.
That’s in theory, what about in practice?
It’ll require the re-teaching of everyone—female and male—in classrooms, homes, through literature, media, art, and networks. It is a process that would take decades, generations, and perhaps even a few centuries. Nevertheless, these are things that should be done to forge a new and vastly superior world. My mission is to devise and describe a framework for the carrying out and success of such objectives.
What kind of men would you choose for breeding? Do you base selection on physical or mental characteristics?
The most suitable men would simply be those who are fit in both body and mind. This is also related to genetic modification.
Genetic engineering is already taking place by way of tests given to couples when they marry to prevent the passing of dangerous genetic material. There is no doubt such concepts will expand as we understand more about how the genome actually works. Healthy and fit men will always be ideal, but not “brutes,” which has more to do with mental attributes than physical. Anyone can lift weights. Any criteria decided upon as the quintessential grade would have to be extensively defined and revised as time goes on, or as science advances and the human species and its needs evolve.
Would men be kept in isolation like stud horses?
I believe we must remove men from the community and place them in their own specific sections of society, akin to subsidised or state-funded reservations, so they can be redefined. We can make not only men safer, but women as well. By subsidising said reservations through the state we can provide men with activities, healthcare, entertainment, shelter, protection, and everything that one could ever require in life. This will remove conventional inequality from society. By reducing the number of men to 10 percent of the total population, their socio-biovalue will be raised. They will live out their lives happily and safely, and male disposability will be a thing of the past.
But don’t men have value beyond breeding?
If technology has not advanced to a point where labour can be done without men, the few men that are necessary for said labour will be allowed to work on the outside of the reservations to complete whatever tasks necessary—if they wish.
Like slaves?
Not as slaves, simply as workers performing a duty, in the same way workers today do. Only without the need for monetary reimbursement as they would have no need for such a thing. This would be highly monitored and regulated.

http://www.newsforage.com/2014/08/meet-woman-who-wants-to-reduce-male.html

26 thoughts on “Meet the Woman Who Wants to Reduce The Male Population by 90% “For Peace”

  1. That is a genuine psycho-bitch. She wants to reduce the male population? The only person she should eliminate is herself, preferably by sticking a stick of dynamite up her twat and lighting the fuse. She would make for a great disciple of Charles Manson.

    1. OH I AGREE WITH HER.
      THERE NEEDS TO BE MORE INNOCENT, NON-MURDEROUS, GENTLE FUZZ-BALLS LIKE HILLARY CLINTON.

    1. It’s better to keep track of these “people” and know what they’re up to, so that the element of surprise is diminished.

      I know of some (other) psycho bitches, personally… but lack resources and any hard evidence to pass along at this time.

  2. I’m not even going to watch this video. The first thought that came to mind is that androcide is pretty violent and I would say, against “peace.” There is no logic to this, and only hatred. It’s too bad there is such misguidedness in this world. But, please be aware that pitting any group against another, whether it is race or gender or socioeconomic, is divisive and works in the service of the NWO. Just something to keep in mind. Individuals who value what each has to offer, united against those who would divide us, is the way to go. Hatred truly gets us nowhere. (that is not to say that moral outrage is a bad thing, and that is also not to say that pacifism is a good thing). Be vigilant.

    1. EE I didn’t watch the video either. This stupid woman doesn’t offer anything of value to anyone, least of all women and what to speak of men. I’m sure she is a tool for the NWO and while there might be a lot of stupid women that might agree with her, I can say that I don’t know anyone of her mindset. Women in general want men in their lives and they love their fathers, husbands, brothers, uncles, etc.

  3. Encountered a similar group in the UK in 03 that claimed to be working on a way to completely eradicate the male gender via Genetically Engineered Viral Weaponry.

    total psycos….

  4. She’d be a prime candidate for a full frontal lobotomy…

    …if she wasn’t already totally brain-dead to begin with.

    1. I personally would not want this planet run by women. God made women to be a helpmeet to a man. Of course, another devil, spewing her masters propaganda, and sounding like an absolute moron!!!
      Men, you all are great, and I never could figure the feminist attitude,crazy! She needs help, asap, as well as any followers.
      I almost wondered if this was a Miss USA speech.

      1. Katie, good comment, and I agree 100% with what you say. I don’t believe that a feminist is nearly as happy as those women that are helpmates to their men. That is, after all, our natural place in life.

  5. She needs to be dealt with, and dumped out of this country along with the other God haters and destroyers of our nation.

  6. However, here is a note supporting her thesis, so to speak but not according to her vision of it:

    According to many Catholic mystics, we are on a verge of WWIII. Many of these mystics have given details of how this is to come about, suddenly and very soon. In there revelations, such as those of St. Hildegard in the 12th Century is this: She reveals that at the end or soon thereafter of the 20th. century will com WWIII and in its aftermath there will be 10-12 women for every man; that women will be “begging” men to marry them, that it will again become a shame, not to be married and have children, women again will fulfill their proper roles of good mothers and obedient wives.

    Now, firstly how did a Catholic nun in the 12th century realize that WWIII would happen at the end or shortly thereafter the 20th century – which gives her revelations great integrity – seems women who don’t have a man know, and if they live through what is coming, will be “begging” men to marry them. Yea lol

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*