listen here

Patriot Broadcast From the Trenches Schedule 

Or you can mail donations to Henry Shivley at P.O. Box 964, Chiloquin, OR 97624

Never Again?

Over the last two thousand years, the Jews have been expelled from more than a hundred different countries around the world. It would be obviously absurd to claim that all these evicting rulers and peoples, from all these different cultures and centuries, all decided to expel the Jews because they were “anti-Semites”, but instead it would only be sensible to look toward the Jews themselves for a possible motive for these drastic measures, and in fact, common sense demands it.

First consider that it’s no easy decision or task for any nation to force a segment of their population to pack up and leave, and in the case of the Jewish expulsions, we’re talking about nations who had already accepted their transient and ghettoized presence. If anything resembling “anti-Semitism” were the reason for their expulsion, they never would have been allowed to reside there in the first place. I believe we can logically conclude that the Jews have been thrown out of a hundred different nations as a result of actions taken by themselves, which actions they continually repeat, and that these same actions are among those that the rest of the human race finds intolerably offensive.   

If common logic dictates that you accept this without accusing me of being an “anti-Semite”, or a “neo-Nazi”, then we may be able to discover exactly why the Jews have been so expelled, and hopefully find a solution to a problem rather than finding a deeper place to bury it. Naturally, this must begin by identifying the aforementioned offensive behaviors, and from there we’ll look for a cause, and then hopefully find a solution.

The most common reasons for the Jewish expulsions were usury, and ritual murder, or a combination of the two. Usury we’re all familiar with, and are suffering the cruel lessons of right now. Ritual murder (the “blood libel”) is well documented in a multitude of records from various courts around the world. It’s not “libel”. It’s history.

So what might cause people to behave in this fashion toward their fellow man? I ask because I’ve never known any desire to fleece anyone of everything they own, or drain the blood of their children, and I believe that most people feel the same way. The force which prevents most of us from ever even considering acts of this nature is our conscience. We feel empathy toward our fellow man, and this makes us loathe to inflict undeserved pain or suffering upon him, and we’re conversely angered when someone inflicts it upon us. The retribution for the commission of such acts is what we call “justice”, which assuages our anger.

That being the case, the next logical question would ask “do Jews lack a conscience which would prevent them inflicting cruelty upon others?”

One place to look for an answer is in who you yourself might inflict wonton cruelty upon without feeling any remorse. Wouldn’t it have to be a being that you felt was your inferior, like a swatted insect, or a trapped mouse? You can kill without remorse as long as you feel no kinship toward the victim. You can enslave dogs to pull sleds, and condition them to be happy for doing it. You can kill an animal for a meal, because that’s how we all survive, but like anything else that lives and kills, the assault is always upon an “inferior” species, and therein lies the reason Jews can so remorselessly attack the rest of humanity, and why they’ve spent ions doing so. They view gentiles as being less than human, much in the way armies train soldiers to view their enemy, which makes them easier to kill.

The reason Jews can attack the rest of us as they do stems from their religion and culture, both of which propagate the myth of Jewish superiority. It has nothing to do with race or ethnicity, or any other condition of their birth. It is solely the result of what they consciously choose to teach their children, which lessons have put them at odds many times with the rest of the human race, and are very close to putting them there again. And since it is the result of conscious choice, it can be changed by decision, and will. If they worked as hard to change their own culture as they do everyone else’s, the last two thousand years would have been a lot nicer for all involved parties, and before I hear anymore crying about “two thousand years of suffering”, I have to wonder if they didn’t deserve every minute of it. And please don’t forget that much of the Jews’ collective suffering was bought and paid for by members of their own tribe.

The myth of Jewish superiority is promoted not only through religion and culture, but lately has expanded to media propaganda, and since this alleged superiority seems to be at the root of the problem, it should be addressed. To begin with, the Jewish state of Israel has an average I.Q. of 90, and centuries of inbreeding has resulted in Jews suffering twice the number of birth defects as the rest of the human race. This isn’t exactly the breeding grounds for superiority, so many Jews point to their dominance in business, academia, and medicine as evidence, but unfortunately, their dominance in those fields is more evidence of the problem rather then something they should look to with pride.

To understand this, we have to understand what it means to be a “good Jew”. We’re not talking about a gentile’s definition, but instead we need to understand why that label would be applied by one Jew to another, or how it’s defined in Jewish culture.

A “good Jew” always puts another Jew before a gentile in situations of employment, promotions, college admissions, loan applications, and legal matters, and will always try to help another Jew, even to the extent of helping to cover up his crimes. Their culture insures eventual dominance via their universal ethic requiring them to show preference to one of their own in all situations, and belief in their superiority justifies their unfairness to everyone else. By always putting another Jew first, and having no concern for the fate of gentiles, they have over decades of relentlessly scratching upward and savagely crushing all in their path, become dominant in any field of their choosing.

We don’t have so many Jewish doctors because Jews are smarter. We have lousy medical care because a Jew’s main concern is promoting another Jew rather than someone more qualified, and the same is true in all Jewish-dominated segments of our society. We have lousy TV, bad movies, poisonous medicine, a lying “news” industry, blackmailed politicians, uneducated students, and ruthless, crooked bankers peddling counterfeit money. All of this is the result of the Jews having their own society within ours that operates by a completely different set of rules and morals than the rest of us. And by ruthlessly conspiring to eliminate all gentile competition by constantly banding together to promote their tribesmen, they’ve scratched their way to a point where they now control much of our world.

Of course I’m not talking about all Jewish people. Many people of Jewish descent have shaken off their ancient culture long ago, and have raised families of high moral fiber, whose actions are guided by the same conscience and the same definitions of right and wrong as the rest of us. That would be a gentile’s definition of a “good Jew”, and there are many of them.

It is to the gentile’s good Jews that I make my appeal. I think most of you understand that anti-Semitism is and always has been a product, and tool of the Zionists. They control the Jewish people using the same fear tactics they use to control any other population. You’ve been conditioned since birth to believe that all gentiles hate you because you’re Jewish, and that your only safety lies in the proximity of other Jews.

This is, of course, ridiculous. Nobody hates you because you’re Jewish. Nobody even cares that you’re Jewish, until you help cover up the same crimes that have angered your host populations for ions. People are hated for what they do, and if you cover up the crimes for another person, Jewish or not, you too are guilty of that crime, and that law is ancient. Jews have been persecuted en masse when they’ve acted en masse to cover up the crimes of another Jew. Do you really think no one notices that most of the “9-11 Truth movement” is now led by Jews trying to blame 9-11 on anyone but Israel? Or that the entire gun control/genocide movement just happens to be Jewish?

Most people usually work to get along, simply because it’s easier than fighting, and most hatred and racial strife is created by governments and other politically motivated organizations to suit their own ends. Such is the case with anti-Semitism. It’s a useful tool of the Zionists, but it will only hurt the Jewish people who believe it exists if it induces them to help cover up the crimes. We need Jewish heroes with the morality and courage of Benjamin Freedman to expose Zionist crimes, because any attack from an outsider usually works to help conceal them. Good Jews have to expose the bad ones, if for no other reason than to show the world that all Jews aren’t guilty. End the persecution by ending the lies, or you’ll probably get yourselves expelled from this country too.       — Jolly Roger

“Let no guilty man escape, if it can be avoided. No personal considerations should stand in the way of performing a public duty.”  —  Ulysses S. Grant

 

Anything written by Jolly Roger is the property of the American people, and the author hereby grants permission to post, copy, or distribute this article in its entirety anywhere you choose to. – J.R.

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.
3847
Don't forget to answer the Security Question before you post comment.

30 Responses to Never Again?

  1. Smilardog says:

    and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan ~ Jesus Christ, Rev 2:9

    • James Davis says:

      It is my understanding that what we call Jews today is nothing more than Edomites.True jews are decendants of the tribe of Judah. Like the other eleven tribes they have lost their identity. Edomites are decendants of Esau.Most migrated to southern Russia and returned from there to Isreal. Your use of the scripture in this case is correct in my humble opinion. Esau name was later changed to Edom.

      • # 1 NWO Hatr says:

        Edomites AND Canaanites. Those falsely claiming to be ‘jews’ are descended from the Pharisees, whom Christ rightly called the spawn of the Devil.

        Rev. 3:9 reinforces 2:9.

        Obviously, it bore repeating.

        Excellent article, JR. You know I post every worthwhile one I come across on these Satanic scum of the Earth.

        • Smilardog says:

          Would I be correct if I was to say that those tribe’s DNA were also corrupted with fallen angel DNA which would make them Nephilim/Raphaim? Which would answer the question someone else’s comment about the reason why God commanded Israel to destroy them and their bloodline. I could dig out my book Angels Wars and check, but I am on my first cig and coffee of the day.

          • # 1 NWO Hatr says:

            Funny you should mention that book. My friend Chris just loaned me his new copy, and I loaned him my copy of Texe Marrs’ Codex Magica. Haven’t had a chance to check it out yet, though. Does he talk about the serpentine DNA in it?

          • Smilardog says:

            I don’t know if he does #1. I haven’t finished reading it. I have had it about two years and still haven’t read it all. When you say, Serpent DNA are you talking about the one where one of the Rothschilds had his DNA tested and it had a tripple helix in which the third strand was actually a serpent intertwined with the double helix… and when viewed under a microscope the serpent appeared to be stairing back at them. Stan Deyo told the story on The Hagmann and Hagmann Report. He said, that a black ops group of some of the greatest warriors in the world had the scrap scared out of them to where their hair turned gray/white, and some had symtoms of heart failing them, while looking at it under the scope. Have you heard that story? or are you just talking about the Cain serpent seedline. Which, I guess would be the same thing either way.

          • # 1 NWO Hatr says:

            I could have sworn that was Steve Q. that talked about that on Hagmann & Hagmann. ?

  2. David2 says:

    What they were expelling was the plague of communism. The life of riches and privalages gained from the theft of the work and savings of others. It is a Jewish thing, their banking is pure theft to reward a privalaged few, it is communist. Ever wonder why all politicians are basically socialist, it is not to benefit others. JUST US is Jewish lawyer speak for justice.

    Ask any Palestinian and you will know who the enemy of mankind is and the cruelty these communists inflict on every society that is unfortunate enough to allow them the freedom to completely pillage all their wealth.

    Soon as the economic collapse is completed and all property foreclosed (stolen), bank deposits stolen, pension funds transferred, stocks and shares embezzled in their con, the 3 billion souls will be ruled over in poverty by 12 million of these communists. Palestine on steroids awaits the world of kindman.

    The enemy of kindman is communist.

  3. Jolly Roger says:

    Who wrote this trash, anyway?

  4. Alberet says:

    It is UNFAIR and WRONG to compare Israel to the Nazis.
    It was the Nazis who copied the Jewish “Manual” point by point
    KILL THE SICK and CRIPPLED
    Numbers c.5 v.2-4
    KILL HOMOSEXUALS
    Leviticus c.20 v.13 well, really the whole chapter
    KILL ALL DISSIDENTS:
    Exodus c.32 v.27
    Numbers c.11 v.1-2
    Numbers c.16 all
    Numbers c.21 v.5-6
    Numbers c.26 v.10
    KILL anyone who engages in “DIVERSITY” or “INTEGRATION”
    Numbers v25 v.4-8
    Deuteronomy c.14 v.2
    DEHUMANIZE-DEMONIZE and then EXTERMINATE ALL NON-MEMBERS:
    Numbers c.21 v.03 Canaanites
    Numbers c.21 v.24 Amorites
    Numbers c.21 v.33-35 Bashan
    Numbers c.31 all Midianites
    Numbers c.32 v. more Amorites
    Deuteronomy c.2 v.34 People of Heshbon
    Deuteronomy c.3 v.6 really the whole chapter. threescore cities
    Joshua c.12 A list of victims of Israeli GENOCIDE
    Where are THEIR “holocaust” Memorials!
    OCCUPY YOUR VICTIM’S DWELLINGS/LAND
    Numbers c.21 v.25
    Numbers c.32 v.39
    Numbers c.33 v.53
    (just to name a FEW)
    GENOCIDE CODIFIED IN THEIR RELIGION
    Numbers c.33 v.31-34
    Deuteronomy c.7 v.2
    Deuteronomy c.12 v.28-30
    Deuteronomy c.20 v.11-16
    TERRORISM CODIFIED IN THEIR RELIGION
    Deuteronomy c.2 v.2
    Deuteronomy c.7 v.1
    Jews SELF-anointed “The CHOSEN People of GOD”
    Nazis SELF-anointed “The genetically CHOSEN People of God”.

    • milidude says:

      You have fallen victim to the dupe. dont feel bad about it. hitler was jewish. most of his inner cabinet was jewish. nazi is a short-name for ashkenazi(khazarian jew from russia- a warring tribe of people). i am both of german and torah juden heritage…i have studied this and am sure of these facts. i grew up being ashamed of my german/jewish hertiage due to taught association with that of hitler and his criminals. hitler was no more a puppet than obama is now. he was bought off by the international bansksters, then double crossed by the constraints of the treaty of versailles, and then by chamberlain during the second world war.

      the zionists wanted the sacrifice known as holocaust(means burnt offering) and even picked a victim count of 6 million to glean world sympathy and then through the league of nations, england drafted israel to them thru an unlawful contract.

      Bible states that ONLY JESUS would lead the judens of exodus back into the promised land. i dont know about you, but Jesus did NOT lead these faux jews into israel. they are imposters, the Bible and Jesus warned us of them, the are ” doing continual evil,a den of vipers, of your father, the devil.

      this hoax is what the sabbatean jew(false jew) counts on never being discovered in order to get away with the theft of the land of palestine. this must come to pass, as their messiah>the devil dajjal must come into the 3rd temple and commit the abomination of desolation when he declares himself god almighty. these are truly astonishing and historical times we are living in.

  5. robertsgt40 says:

    To understand the zionist blueprint, Google “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”, first printed in 1905. BTW, today’s Jews are a product of mass conversion in 750AD in Khazaria. Not the seed of Abraham.

  6. Ann Onymouse says:

    “End the persecution by ending the lies, or you’ll probably get yourselves expelled from this country too. — Jolly Roger” Ha ha… what a laugh! Just try and get rid of this cancer… what are we waiting for? It cannot be done until all their actions are ILLEGAL and the US and all western countries find some leadership who cannot be compromised and will cleanse their countries of these vermin.

    • Jolly Roger says:

      In the past it was usually done by angry populations, using less-than-lawful means.

      When a justice system collapses, as ours has, and people start to realize it, they WILL take the law into their own hands, because they will want one form of justice or another, with or without a properly functioning legal system.

  7. abubaqar says:

    In Praise of Medieval England
    A golden age recalled by Stephen Mitford Goodson

    The Middle Ages are frequently associated with backwardness, tyranny and poverty: a period in which life was hard and short. Notwithstanding the absence of technological benefits in the fields of medicine and science, this was in reality an age in which prosperity and happiness were abundant and widely diffused.

    The litmus test of any successful civilisation is the financial arrangements which prevail in its economic life. Are the means of exchange – that is money and credit – issued by the state for the sole benefit of its inhabitants, or are they controlled and manipulated by private bankers for their own enrichment and the enslavement of the people?

    In mediaeval England state finances were firmly in the hands of the king, but prior to 1290 they were in the grip of a group of marauding moneylenders.

    The laws against usury before the arrival of William the Conqueror in 1066 were very strict. In 899 King Alfred (871-99) directed that the property of usurers be forfeited, while in 1050 Edward the Confessor (1042-66) decreed not only forfeiture, but that a usurer be declared an outlaw and banished for life.

    These wise laws were abandoned when the Normans defeated the English at Hastings on October 14th 1066. William I (1066-87) was accompanied by a party of Jewish settlers, who had been resident in Rouen, Normandy, since Roman times. Circumstantial evidence indicates that these Jews had provided financial support for William’s military campaign in return for the right to practise usury in England under royal protection.

    It was, however, William’s son Rufus (1087-1100) who actively permitted these Jews to engage in lending money at interest – a venture in which he initially took a 50 per cent share of the profits. In order to pay the interest on loans advanced to the Crown, Rufus was obliged to tax the populace, which engendered much resentment towards him. The Encyclopaedia Britannica provides a vivid description of this odious man:-

    ‘In appearance William II was unattractive; bullnecked, with sloping shoulders, extremely corpulent and awkward in his gait; His long locks and clean-shaven face marked his predilection for the newfangled fashions which contemporary ecclesiastics were never weary of denouncing. His features were strongly marked and coarse, his eyes grey and deeply set; he owed his nickname (Rufus) to the fiery hue of his complexion. He stuttered violently and in moments of passion was almost inarticulate. His familiar conversation was witty and blasphemous. He was surrounded by a circle of vicious parasites, and no semblance of decorum was maintained in his household.

    ‘His character was assailed by the darkest rumours, which he never attempted to refute. He died unmarried and without issue.’

    Those Jews not involved in the money-lending racket traded in corn and wool or dealt in trinkets, cheap jewellery and useless junk. Although it was forbidden by statute, many of them engaged in coin-clipping, that is filing and clipping the edges of coins and putting them back into circulation as clipped coins. The filings and clippings were then melted into bullion. A similar fraud they perpetrated was the plating of tin with silver and then selling it as silver-plate.

    Incensed by alien practice
    Another practice which incensed the English merchants was the custom of Jewish traders of selling a whole range of merchandise under one roof. Items such as candles, cloth, iron, leather, silver- ware which were normally sold in separate shops, were all disposed of in a bazaar type operation. The greed of these traders caused both anger and impoverishment amongst the merchant class and undermined the guilds.

    The moneylenders charged princes and other noblemen interest rates of at least 33 per cent per annum on lands which they had mortgaged. The working class, who pledged their tools of trade or chattels, were expected to pay rates of up to 300 per cent per annum. Not unexpectedly, within two generations one quarter of all English lands were in the ownership of Jewish usurers.

    The allegations of ritual murder of pre-adolescent Christian boys around the time of the Jewish Passover, or Pesach, added greatly to the general clamour that all Jews should be removed from England.

    In 1233 the Statutum de Judeismo restricted the lending activities of the Jewish money-lenders, and in 1275 a statute abolished all forms of usury. An extract from the latter statute reads as follows:-

    ‘Forasmuch as the King hath seen that divers evils and the disinheriting of good men of his land have happened by the usuries which the Jews have made in time past, and that divers sins have followed thereupon that he and his ancestors have received much benefit from the Jewish people in all times past, nevertheless, for the honour of God and the common benefit of the people, the King hath ordained and established that from henceforth no Jew shall lend anything at usury either upon land or upon other thing (writer’s emphasis).

    ‘And that no usuries shall run in time coming from the feast of St. Edward last past. Notwithstanding the covenants before made shall be observed, saving that the usuries shall cease. But all those who owe debts to Jews upon pledge of moveables shall acquit them between this and Easter; if not they shall be forfeited. And if any Jew shall lend at usury contrary to this Ordinance, the King will not lend his aid, neither by himself or his officers for the recovering of his loan; but will punish him at his discretion for the offence and will do justice to the Christian that he may obtain his pledges again.

    ‘And that the distress for debts due unto the Jews from henceforth shall not be so grievous, but that the moiety of lands and chattels of the Christians shall remain for their maintenance; and that no distress shall be made for a Jewry debt upon the heir of the debtor named in the Jew’s deed, nor upon any other person holding the land that was the debtor’s before that the debt be put in suit and allowed in court.’

    Finally, in 1290 on July 18th a statute was passed by King Edward I (1272-1307) and the House of Commons compelling all Jews* to leave England for ever by November 1st of that year. Any Jews who remained in the kingdom after that date were liable to be executed.

    The announcement of the expulsion was greeted with great joy and jubilation throughout the land. Unlike with the modern practice of ethnic cleansing, the Jews after paying a tax of 1/15th of the value of their moveables and 1/10th of their specie were permitted to leave with all their goods and chattels.

    National finances
    With the banishment of the money-lenders and the abolition of usury, we may observe how the finances of the English nation were practised at the different levels of society.

    For the individual who wished to buy a house costing, say, £100 he would be required to make a down-payment of £10 and negotiate a loan of £90 from a bank. He would own 10 per cent of the house and the bank would own the remaining 90 per cent. Rent would be payable on the house of which 10 per cent would accrue to himself and the balance of 90 per cent to the bank. The following year he would pay the bank a further instalment of 10 per cent, reducing the bank’s ownership to 80 per cent and the amount of rent payable to it. These instalments would be continued until he owned 100 per cent of the property.

    In the event of the buyer defaulting on his rent payments he would be evicted. However, he could never lose that portion of the house he had paid for and would continue to receive rent on it. House price inflation was not a factor during this era, as the rate of inflation was zero – as it should be. In any normal society which does not practise usury.

    A business loan would be agreed on the following terms:-

    A fishing captain of sufficient years’ experience who wished to purchase his own boat would approach a bank for a loan. He would buy a boat, which would belong to the bank. The bank would pay him a salary. After one year he would have the option to buy 10 per cent of the boat and receive 10 per cent of the profits. This procedure would continue until he owned 100 per cent of the boat. If, for example, after two years the bank decided to cancel the agreement because the captain was doing a poor job, he would still retain his 20 per cent share. In the event of the boat sinking, the insurance would cover it. The essence of this contract was that it was fair to both sides and that risk was equally shared by both borrower and lender.

    The tally stick
    The finances of the English Crown from 1290 onwards were centred around what was known as the `tally stick`. This ancient instrument of finance, known to the Saracens and possibly also to the Chinese, is derived from the Latin word tallia, meaning a stick. A tally stick was made out of hazel, willow or boxwood because these woods split easily. They were usually eight inches in length (from forefinger to thumb) and half an inch wide, although they could be up to eight feet long.

    The denominations were indicated by differently sized cuts in the wood. A thousand pounds was marked by cutting out the thickness of the palm of a hand, one hundred pounds by the breadth of the little finger, one pound that of a swelling barleycorn, shillings somewhat less; and pence were marked by incisions. The payee was recorded on the flat sides.

    When all the details had been recorded on the tally it was split nearly to the bottom, so that one part retained a stump, or handle, on which a hole would be bored. This was known as the counter-tally, or counterfoil, and was held on a rod at the Exchequer. The flat strip (without the stump) was given to the payee. As no two pieces of wood are identical, it was impossible to forge a tally stick.

    Tally sticks were first introduced during the reign of King Henry I (1100-35) and would remain in circulation until 1783. It was, however, during the period 1290-1485 that tallies would reach their apogee and constitute the principal means of state finance. Tallies were used not only to pay state salaries, but to finance major items of infrastructure, such as construction of the wall of the City of London, public buildings and ports.

    The exact amount of tallies in circulation during this period is not known, but as late as 1694 £17 million worth were still in existence. This was a prodigious sum, as the King’s annual budget rarely exceeded £2.5 million, and a labourer earned only a penny a day.

    With very few taxes, no state debt and no interest to pay, a contented and prosperous life was enjoyed by all the inhabitants of England. A labourer could provide for all the necessities his family required. People were well clothed in good woollen cloth and had plenty of meat and bread.

    Houston Stewart Chamberlain, the German-domiciled British philosopher, confirms these living conditions in The Foundations of the 19th Century:-

    ‘In the thirteenth century, when the Teutonic races began to build up their new world, the agriculturist over nearly the whole of Europe was a freer man, with a more assured existence, than he is to-day (writer’s emphasis): copyhold was the rule, so that England, for example – today a seat of landlordism – was even in the fifteenth century almost entirely in the hands of hundreds of thousands of farmers, who were not only legal owners of their land but possessed, in addition, far-reaching free rights to common pastures and woodlands.’

    The average labourer in those days worked only 14 weeks a year and, not surprisingly, there were 160 to 180 holidays a year. According to Lord Leverhulme, a writer on that period, “The men of the 15th century were very well paid.” In fact they were so well paid that it would only be by the late 19th century that a worker’s wages equalled the buying power of those of the mediaeval period.

    Visitor observes prosperity
    An Italian traveller visiting England in the reign of King Henry VII (1485-1509) gives a glimpse of the prosperity he found in London:-

    ‘…In one single street, named Strada (Cheapside), leading to St. Paul’s, there are fifty-two goldsmiths’ shops, so rich and full of silver vessels, great and small, that in all the shops in Milan, Rome, Venice and Florence put together I do not think there would be found so many of the magnificence that are to be seen in London.’

    The large amount of free time available enabled the English country folk to indulge in fishing, hunting, hawking and snaring, while studying and reading were popular in the winter months. This explains why this period has always been known as ‘Merrie England’, Shakespeare described England as being…

    ‘This royal throne of kings, this scepter’d isle, This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars, This other Eden, demi-Paradise.’

    A feature of mediaeval life in England was the prominent role which religion played. With a population of only five million, some 100,000 pilgrims would be visiting Canterbury Cathedral and other shrines at any one time. Piety and meditation formed an integral part of their devotions.

    The nation’s wealth could be seen in the beautiful Gothic cathedrals, which were erected throughout the land. Many of them were built with the help of voluntary labour. G.M. Trevelyan, the social historian, writes that…

    ‘The continuous but ever-moving tradition of ecclesiastical architecture still proceeded on its majestic way, filling England with towering forests of masonry of which the beauty and grandeur have never been rivalled either by the Ancients or the Moderns. In the newer churches the light no longer crept but flooded in, through the stained glass, of which the secret is today even more completely lost than the magic of the architecture.’

    Critics might raise the objection that during this epoch England was involved in the Hundred Years’ War (1337-1453). However, many of these battles were little more than large-scale archery contests, and none was fought on English soil. The English crossbowman was the most skilled exponent of this type of warfare. At Agincourt, October 25th 1415, the principal battle of that war, contemporary estimates of English casualties range from 14 to 1,600.

    With the advent in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries of the goldsmiths, who practised fraudulent banking based on fractional reserves, this glorious period in European history slowly came to a close. On June 1 1694 it terminated with the establishment of the Bank of England and the institution of a National Debt. This private bank took over the finances of the Crown and is directly responsible for having reduced the English and other British to their current status of debt slavery.

    * The Jewish population at the time was approximately 16,000.

  8. Tom says:

    One of the most interesting books I’ve ever read on religion is titled _Darwin’s Cathedral — Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society_ by David Sloan Wilson. His thesis is that religion has historically served as a form of “group selection” in Darwinian terms. There is still debate about whether or not group selection exists, the opposing side arguing that genes can only be acted upon at the level of the individual organism, not a group. That ignores vast evidence that the acts of an individual can promote the genetic success of a group or species.

    Our own Christian experience with this phenomenon can be seen in the doctrine of “Manifest Destiny” which declared that God wanted us to take over this continent from the “savage” Indians because our culture was superior to theirs. The success of that approach can be seen in current demographics: there are a few more Europeans here now than Indians. Group selection, indeed. The same can be seen happening now to the Palestinians.

    A very current example of this can be found in Myanmar, where the death toll has reached the thousands. Muslims are moving in, encroaching on an ancient Buddhist culture, and the Buddhists, in spite of their normally peaceful ways, are finally pushing back.

    One thing that the science of DNA has taught us is that the total genetic variation among humans worldwide, between all races and places, is vanishingly small. The one genetic variation that should concern us all is the one that codes for psychopathy. This is most clearly characterized by a heritable lack of conscience, which Jolly Roger mentions as part of the ruthless Jewish exploitation of gentiles.

    It’s my hypothesis that psychopathy was held in check in our ancestral environment because in small tribal groups it wasn’t tolerated and there were few opportunities for survival outside of tribes. “Civilization” changed that, and the numbers of psychopaths among us have been slowly breeding up for the last ten thousand years. I have no evidence that the numbers of psychopaths among Jews is any higher than for the rest of humanity, but a tight tribal cohesiveness could leverage the damage that the psychopaths among them can do to the rest of us by helping them and covering for them, which Jolly Roger also mentions.

    I also believe that the NWO is primarily a project by and for psychopaths, whether Jewish or not. We are at a genetic crossroads for humanity: we can defeat the psychopaths of all religions and political persuasions, or we can live with their boot on our necks. Whether it’s a Jewish boot or someone else’s doesn’t matter.

  9. Ben says:

    Thank you. Thank you for having the courage to tell UNIVERSAL TRUTH!

    Blessings,

  10. David2 says:

    The deliberate transfer of industry to China, the deliberate encouraging of people to rely on property as a secure retirement investment, the deliberate quantitative easing by the FED and buying of mortgage backed securities by these whores is leading to the grand theft of all property.

    There will be war to coincide with their planned economic collapse so that the fools will not directly blame them. Broke people cannot repay mortgage debt and the Fed will hold most mortgages and title deeds in the grand foreclosure theft ahead for us all.

    Rent will be their new usury, your home, deposits, stocks, pensions will be their wealth and you will wonder how it could have happened and unlike the quiz in Henry’s comments you will not add one and one together in your despair. There will be no debt in their new system so no finance for wealth creation just as in Palestine today, permanent broke is to be the new normal for the 3 billion fools but not for the communist whores.

    • JM says:

      @David2- friend, you’re assuming we are just going to continue to stand idly by as these final thefts occur. Yes we will stand idly by – at their executions, and after the Republic is restored.

  11. DanD says:

    Tom certainly has a point, as Zionism’s rather inbred Jewish elite have always micro-managed the goy-induced pogroms used over the millennia to cull the assimilating ranks of its own am-ha aretz. Meanwhile, as low-class Jewry was punished for elite crimes, those same elites yet escaped so that they (and/or their progeny) could — once again — rebuild at some later time the criminal empire prevalently being excommunicated from any assaulted Gentile society.

    A defined criticism … there are many “races,” within humanity, there is however, only one human species. To speak of only one human “race” is flawed, and regularly invites an all too common bigoted interpretation. Elsewise, the history seems accurate.

    DanD

    • David2 says:

      It seems odd to dwell and argue on the semantics of history when right now the game of chess is being played like a masterpiece to steal all property and all wealth.

      A few weeks ago the people of Cyprus were free and wealthy, along came the master chess playing communists and today they are losing homes, cash, jobs, future for their children. Tomorrow much worse is planned for all of us reading this great site and the thief usually comes under the cover of darkness and next day part of our lives have been stolen for good.

      The Fed is buying up all our mortgages using counterfeit printed money for a reason. Especially in an economic collapse the bankers always win, they hold your debt in their stinking hands and Shylock always demands his debt in full with usury and penalties, the communist law of an eye for an eye but thousand fold, it s called just us.

  12. Millard says:

    What kind of god’s “Chosen People” would exploit, lie, cheat, steal, starve, and rape the rest of mankind. As Smilardog stated at the beginning of this comment thread, Revelations 2:9. Excellent article J.R.

  13. flek says:

    Not to preach to the choir, but may be insightful…

    http://www.biblestudysite.com/factsarefacts.htm

    THE TRUTH ABOUT KHAZARS (the so-called Jews)

    Distinguishing between the “Jew”, and Hebrews who are Israelites.

    By Benjamin H. Freedman: ‘A Jewish man writes about the Jews’

  14. kim says:

    However this goes down: they get nothing out of me. In a worst case scenario: I choose the “SCORCHED EARTH” option……and then some, for good measure.
    “Gods chosen” ? “Divine Intervention” ? Never happened, NEVER WILL. If there is a God, he would be just and wise, he would wipe that scum from the earth. On a second thought: he would never have created such demented animals. If we agree there is a God: there is also his alter ego known as SATAN.
    If Jesus Christ really is the son of God: he was spot on when he said they are spawn of the Devil.
    Boycott, Divest, and Sanction those Nazi trash. Deny all foreign aid to those merchants of death, blood lust, slavery, usury, pedophilia, war mongering, etc. Their very existence is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.
    Return Palestine to the true Semitic people who lived there for over 2,000 years.

  15. NC says:

    Great article, JR. Didn’t know it was you that wrote it at first. Keep it up! I enjoy reading them, dude.

  16. Choward Newsis says:

    The Talmud’s Treatise Sanhedrin does it for me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What is 8 + 4 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)